From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@nxp.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
shenwei.wang@nxp.com, linux-serial <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-imx@nxp.com, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: Fix possible integer overflow
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 12:56:20 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e0fe2036-e22-3bb4-a5a-afab1a5869e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3652da4b-8ccf-34a8-bdb7-757a3109ac54@kernel.org>
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 18. 07. 23, 8:56, Sherry Sun wrote:
> > This patch addresses the following Coverity report, fix it by casting
> > sport->port.frame_time to type u64.
> >
> > CID 32305660: Unintentional integer overflow (OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN)
> > Potentially overflowing expression sport->port.frame_time * 8U with type
> > unsigned int (32 bits, unsigned) is evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic,
> > and then used in a context that expects an expression of type u64 (64
> > bits, unsigned).
> >
> > Fixes: cf9aa72d2f91 ("tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: optimize the timer based EOP
> > logic")
> > Signed-off-by: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@nxp.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
> > b/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
> > index c1980ea52666..07b3b26732db 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
> > @@ -1373,7 +1373,7 @@ static inline int lpuart_start_rx_dma(struct
> > lpuart_port *sport)
> > sport->last_residue = 0;
> > sport->dma_rx_timeout = max(nsecs_to_jiffies(
> > - sport->port.frame_time * DMA_RX_IDLE_CHARS), 1UL);
> > + (u64)sport->port.frame_time * DMA_RX_IDLE_CHARS), 1UL);
>
> Can you explain how that can overflow? In the worst case (1 start bit, 8 data
> bits, 2 stop bits, parity bit, address bit, 50 bauds), frame_time would
> contain:
> 13*1e9/50 = 260,000,000. (260 ms)
>
> Then the multiplication above is:
> 260,000,000*8 = 2,080,000,000. (2 seconds)
>
> which is still less than 2^32-1.
I was wondering the same thing.
This isn't a real bug. All findings from code analysis tools must be
carefully evaluated to filter wheat out of chaff and this falls into the
latter category. Please make sure next time you understand and explain
also in the changelog how the problem can be manifested for real before
sending this kind of patches.
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-18 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-18 6:56 [PATCH] tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: Fix possible integer overflow Sherry Sun
2023-07-18 9:33 ` Jiri Slaby
2023-07-18 9:56 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2023-07-18 11:03 ` Sherry Sun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e0fe2036-e22-3bb4-a5a-afab1a5869e@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shenwei.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=sherry.sun@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox