From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F20C3279B for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 06:36:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1129924732 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 06:36:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="CgHkoCrX" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1129924732 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933274AbeGDGgq (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2018 02:36:46 -0400 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:41394 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752990AbeGDGgo (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2018 02:36:44 -0400 Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w646ZZMi130969; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 01:35:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1530686135; bh=1ffa+Jcu6G47eAHvMu2fdD15mC2HBX0p8kKLV9dzkr4=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=CgHkoCrXlr1lLz0n2sa0sc6UjpQhSIhOlmR5NYez7ac6aUxpCnOPQcUqiKXX2snZR jdnJPGb7PUfCEscCn6OQCOaeOWa/5CBa3dn4tbt1BkmprzPKGRrZBSIBd0iPiKZJtw G7eRnR8SsYXLYfUrlbDGn19BP2qR2XhWslp2IuDc= Received: from DLEE105.ent.ti.com (dlee105.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.35]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w646ZZZb014699; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 01:35:35 -0500 Received: from DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) by DLEE105.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 01:35:35 -0500 Received: from dflp32.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.15) by DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1466.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 01:35:35 -0500 Received: from [172.24.190.172] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w646ZU7S003164; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 01:35:30 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] ARM: davinci: remove duplicate aemif support To: David Lechner , Bartosz Golaszewski , Kevin Hilman , Russell King , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd CC: , , , Bartosz Golaszewski References: <20180628095748.4462-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <52a274f1-283a-a14a-54f3-4b95b6605c4f@ti.com> <59fdc532-bb72-ffae-cfb6-a7f156c14771@lechnology.com> From: Sekhar Nori Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 12:05:29 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <59fdc532-bb72-ffae-cfb6-a7f156c14771@lechnology.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi David, On Monday 02 July 2018 09:02 PM, David Lechner wrote: > On 07/02/2018 07:28 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> Hi David, Stephen, >> >> On Thursday 28 June 2018 03:27 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski >>> >>> This series moves all aemif/nand users to using the ti-aemif platform >>> driver located in drivers/memory instead of the older API located in >>> mach-davinci. >>> >>> First five patches add necessary changes to the clock driver. Next >>> seven convert the board files to using the ti-aemif driver. Last patch >>> removes now dead code. >> >> How do you want to handle this series? I can apply the series and >> provide you an immutable branch on v4.18-rc1 with the clock patches >> applied if that can work. > > Sounds good to me. But I'm new to this maintainer thing, so maybe > there is something to consider that I haven't thought of? I don't think there is more to it. Ultimately there should not be two commits for the same patch. Either you can apply and share the commit to use or I can do that as well. I am equally fine either way. Regards, Sekhar