Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] drm/bridge: tc358768: Fix bit updates

[Maxim Schwalm <maxim.schwalm@gmail.com>]

Hi Tomi,

On 16.08.23 13:25, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> The driver has a few places where it does:
> 
> if (thing_is_enabled_in_config)
> 	update_thing_bit_in_hw()
> 
> This means that if the thing is _not_ enabled, the bit never gets
> cleared. This affects the h/vsyncs and continuous DSI clock bits.
> 
> Fix the driver to always update the bit.
> 
> Fixes: ff1ca6397b1d ("drm/bridge: Add tc358768 driver")
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c | 13 +++++++------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c
> index bc97a837955b..b668f77673c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c
> @@ -794,8 +794,8 @@ static void tc358768_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>  		val |= BIT(i + 1);
>  	tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_HSTXVREGEN, val);
>  
> -	if (!(mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_CLOCK_NON_CONTINUOUS))
> -		tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_TXOPTIONCNTRL, 0x1);
> +	tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_TXOPTIONCNTRL,
> +		       (mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_CLOCK_NON_CONTINUOUS) ? 0 : BIT(0));
>  
>  	/* TXTAGOCNT[26:16] RXTASURECNT[10:0] */
>  	val = tc358768_to_ns((lptxcnt + 1) * dsibclk_nsk * 4);
> @@ -861,11 +861,12 @@ static void tc358768_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>  	tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_DSI_HACT, hact);
>  
>  	/* VSYNC polarity */
> -	if (!(mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_NVSYNC))
> -		tc358768_update_bits(priv, TC358768_CONFCTL, BIT(5), BIT(5));
> +	tc358768_update_bits(priv, TC358768_CONFCTL, BIT(5),
> +			     (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC) ? BIT(5) : 0);
> +
>  	/* HSYNC polarity */
> -	if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PHSYNC)
> -		tc358768_update_bits(priv, TC358768_PP_MISC, BIT(0), BIT(0));
> +	tc358768_update_bits(priv, TC358768_PP_MISC, BIT(0),
> +			     (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PHSYNC) ? BIT(0) : 0);
>  
>  	/* Start DSI Tx */
>  	tc358768_write(priv, TC358768_DSI_START, 0x1);
> 

shouldn't the last patch of this series be moved before this one?
Currently, this patch will still lead to a temporary regression until
patch #12 is applied.

Best regards,
Maxim