From: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@android.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
avri.altman@wdc.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, stanley.chu@mediatek.com,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: should not override buffer lengh
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:02:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1b29f7cdd62cefcc9355baaed66641f@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6551e7d6dd7dc4132dc69e77a51f6f21@codeaurora.org>
Sorry, typo corrected.
Hi Jaegeuk,
I think the problem is that func ufshcd_read_desc_param() is not
expecting
one access unsupported descriptors on RPMB LU.
If we can get the right buf_len from func
ufshcd_map_desc_id_to_length(),
the issue won't happen. -
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1323421/.
What do you think if we update ufshcd_map_desc_id_to_length(add one
param - desc_index)
so that it can tell the correct buf_len in case of RPMB LU?
Thanks,
Can Guo.
> On 2021-01-11 12:44, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@google.com>
>>
>> Kernel stack violation when getting unit_descriptor/wb_buf_alloc_units
>> from
>> rpmb lun. The reason is the unit descriptor length is different per
>> LU.
>>
>> The lengh of Normal LU is 45, while the one of rpmb LU is 35.
>>
>> int ufshcd_read_desc_param(struct ufs_hba *hba, ...)
>> {
>> param_offset=41;
>> param_size=4;
>> buff_len=45;
>> ...
>> buff_len=35 by rpmb LU;
>>
>> if (is_kmalloc) {
>> /* Make sure we don't copy more data than available */
>> if (param_offset + param_size > buff_len)
>> param_size = buff_len - param_offset;
>> --> param_size = 250;
>> memcpy(param_read_buf, &desc_buf[param_offset], param_size);
>> --> memcpy(param_read_buf, desc_buf+41, 250);
>>
>> [ 141.868974][ T9174] Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector:
>> Kernel stack is corrupted in: wb_buf_alloc_units_show+0x11c/0x11c
>> }
>> }
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>> index 2a715f13fe1d..722697b57777 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>> @@ -3293,8 +3293,12 @@ int ufshcd_read_desc_param(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>>
>> if (is_kmalloc) {
>> /* Make sure we don't copy more data than available */
>> - if (param_offset + param_size > buff_len)
>> - param_size = buff_len - param_offset;
>> + if (param_offset + param_size > buff_len) {
>> + if (buff_len > param_offset)
>> + param_size = buff_len - param_offset;
>> + else
>> + param_size = 0;
>> + }
>> memcpy(param_read_buf, &desc_buf[param_offset], param_size);
>> }
>> out:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-11 6:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-11 4:44 [PATCH] scsi: ufs: should not override buffer lengh Jaegeuk Kim
2021-01-11 5:53 ` Can Guo
2021-01-11 6:02 ` Can Guo [this message]
2021-01-11 8:15 ` Avri Altman
2021-01-11 8:19 ` Can Guo
2021-01-11 8:46 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e1b29f7cdd62cefcc9355baaed66641f@codeaurora.org \
--to=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@google.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox