The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: ZhaoJinming <zhaojinming@uniontech.com>,
	horms@kernel.org, andrew@lunn.ch, madalin.bucur@nxp.com
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, sean.anderson@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fman: guard IRQ handlers against pre-init interrupt
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 17:06:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1f8aec9-751b-4a51-ab09-ca3c37522e30@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260629084529.3709393-1-zhaojinming@uniontech.com>

On 6/29/26 10:45 AM, ZhaoJinming wrote:
> read_dts_node() registers shared interrupt handlers via
> devm_request_irq() with fman as the dev_id, passing it to fman_irq()
> and fman_err_irq(). At registration time, fman is only partially
> initialized -- kzalloc_obj() zero-initializes all fields, so
> fman->cfg and fman->fpm_regs are NULL.
> 
> The handlers guard against incomplete initialization via:
> 
>     if (!is_init_done(fman->cfg))
>         return IRQ_NONE;
> 
> However, is_init_done(NULL) returns true (intended to indicate that
> fman_init() has completed and cfg has been freed). This means when
> cfg is NULL before fman_config() allocates it, the guard does not
> take effect:
> 
>     is_init_done(NULL)  -> returns true
>     !true            -> false
>     guard skipped     -> proceeds to dereference NULL fpm_regs
> 
> If another device on the same shared IRQ line fires during the window
> between devm_request_irq() and fman_init(), the handler accesses
> NULL fman->fpm_regs via ioread32be(), causing a crash. The window
> includes of_platform_populate() which can be slow.
> 
> Add an irq_ready flag to struct fman that is set to true only after
> fman_init() completes in fman_probe(). Check this flag at the start
> of fman_irq() and fman_err_irq() before any register access.
> 
> Use READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() for the flag accesses since it is a
> cross-context shared variable written in process context and read
> in interrupt context.
> 
> This issue was identified in code review during the discussion of a
> separate IRQF_SHARED UAF fix patch:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260626162323.GE1310988@horms.kernel.org/
> 
> Signed-off-by: ZhaoJinming <zhaojinming@uniontech.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman.c | 5 +++++
>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman.h | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman.c
> index 013273a2de32..f14cb02d85a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman.c
> @@ -2510,6 +2510,8 @@ static irqreturn_t fman_err_irq(int irq, void *handle)
>  	struct fman_fpm_regs __iomem *fpm_rg;
>  	irqreturn_t single_ret, ret = IRQ_NONE;
>  
> +	if (!READ_ONCE(fman->irq_ready))
> +		return IRQ_NONE;

Sashiko noted that on weakly ordered arch this could not be enough:

https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260629084529.3709393-1-zhaojinming%40uniontech.com

Also I have the feeling this is papering over the real issue. Why
initializing the irq when the driver is not yet ready? Why don't move
IRQ initialization later?

/P


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-01 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-29  8:45 [PATCH] net: fman: guard IRQ handlers against pre-init interrupt ZhaoJinming
2026-07-01 15:06 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2026-07-02  9:28   ` ZhaoJinming
2026-07-02  9:28     ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net: fman: move IRQ registration after init to prevent NULL deref and UAF ZhaoJinming
2026-07-02 20:42       ` Andrew Lunn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e1f8aec9-751b-4a51-ab09-ca3c37522e30@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madalin.bucur@nxp.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
    --cc=zhaojinming@uniontech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox