From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-187.mta1.migadu.com (out-187.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4F473A6416 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 13:42:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.187 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776260560; cv=none; b=nnopwIg5G4nbb1Yl8yU+mwV9c2Ggvjq6qQRcYBTZUnE1RWvhcBkjFafmf+Ox+TAk8KvLw5aqlIC/y5ZPMzYr49N+u7ejK867Ktau6DwqQ9hhnTgdsz+fTwN1n3CrPMKL63lM+o+C4y2d+hNmqaPIjFJC2Rr46UrvO/hrlld+BR8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776260560; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yXz3IHmHw32KcF6mPZgwa4GmacNrE3CcrPZo91cUb7Q=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=c6NhaB/GNDjghIDFdZ5bhKPf6fl/1etNoZpa1RBx4xiAoiECRBe/MPXtqPsKiv9xF3AkH4RNg5ScK1U3Nv/2yQNxCROlfGUfYkahbm0SM2/BpzTMEItkvTQTW8oNo7zarKktfIzNxpGBNQ/CfqsZMUTGskAvpfMJG+2/AWzL7gY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=eBiP7Kuf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.187 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="eBiP7Kuf" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1776260547; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=O5oIioMHr7aD6sCHzsChx22C5Y/zbhyOkdBb96sokfI=; b=eBiP7Kuf/sIaaOhuCg3k3OZvoT7dcRd0/qBKbsngdMPrh6MvmlNlA8LHbWNMQhOxqKChTG uVkBjGh9QJTnHROFAoHdBs0pJssriDcDt5ytgFR7tzUE0FR2p0HVcIEOjyq2O6xxq2d7EX jhwHDx27h1Gq6UhhOKRoXos0jJ1umsU= Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 21:42:09 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH net v6 1/2] flow_dissector: do not dissect PPPoE PFC frames To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260415022456.141758-1-qingfang.deng@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Qingfang Deng In-Reply-To: <20260415022456.141758-1-qingfang.deng@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT The patch state is "Changes Requested" in patchwork but I haven't received any feedback. Was it set by mistake?