From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935953AbYDQKFo (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:05:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S935039AbYDQJqS (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:46:18 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:25735 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934919AbYDQJqQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:46:16 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=ZxFRx8z+nX6K0UIxkrFAplVDX1IJW4Myc7qmHgUEYkTlmwX+mA9pepm+sPqPVLpZKnuYo0tUNDCJCnqiOcZmm/s8IVT1NV0gE1GWyfkHxviOJGNCoGoE41o385GwWefwBSaLG5x0cAu8lW6K4yjbfrX7eGY1YDoh5Q0d7FkFXsY= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:46:14 +0200 From: "Bart Van Assche" To: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" Subject: 2.6.25 section mismatches Cc: rufus-azrael@numericable.fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Apparently there is a significant number of section mismatches in the 2.6.25 kernel. These were already reported against 2.6.25-rc1 and are still present in the final 2.6.25 release. These section mismatches show up at least on the i386 and x86_64 architectures. Maybe it's a good idea before a patch is merged not only to check whether the patch applies cleanly but also to check whether it doesn't create any new section mismatches ? See also http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9974. Bart.