From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934669AbYDQQtr (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:49:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764172AbYDQQti (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:49:38 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.154]:34958 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760764AbYDQQth (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:49:37 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZTTWcoaCx8/tJHv+fZ2B5P/zJvi+s00KJ5/YY+GAxeM/EjWwrVC6Wu4D5fRvpoV9V6XA0Y0Q9ew2jlSSXCgHlzWAseQK0s3UbKr8PEa4iA+ek7PkZdEpZfRknmb6bqC4KRCx+o6jEi8i3LFQJneNJ2FOkO2+U92MBWcgJVNqkho= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:49:36 +0200 From: "Bart Van Assche" To: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , "Chris Wright" Subject: Re: 2.6.25 section mismatches Cc: rufus-azrael@numericable.fr In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Apparently there is a significant number of section mismatches in the > 2.6.25 kernel. These were already reported against 2.6.25-rc1 and are > still present in the final 2.6.25 release. These section mismatches > show up at least on the i386 and x86_64 architectures. Maybe it's a > good idea before a patch is merged not only to check whether the patch > applies cleanly but also to check whether it doesn't create any new > section mismatches ? > > See also http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9974. Who should look into this ? Bart.