From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
yury.norov@gmail.com
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] smp: Fix smp_call_function_any() if no CPU online
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 23:40:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e381fd4b-fb90-41ae-a480-0dad1ce2aa9f@arm.com> (raw)
smp_call_function_any() used to handle a mask without any online
CPUs just fine, but when switching to use sched_numa_find_nth_cpu()
a previous check for online CPUs was removed.
smp_call_function_single() handles invalid CPUs just fine, so
just add the check back before calling sched_numa_find_nth_cpu().
An observed issue was when initializing PMUs on HMP if all CPUs
were offline (e.g. by booting with maxcpus):
[ 1.192642] Call trace:
[ 1.192868] sched_numa_find_nth_cpu+0xc0/0x170 (P)
[ 1.193323] smp_call_function_any+0xc8/0xd0
[ 1.193724] armv8_pmu_init+0x58/0x27c
[ 1.194079] armv8_cortex_a72_pmu_init+0x20/0x2c
[ 1.194507] arm_pmu_device_probe+0x1e4/0x5e8
[ 1.194911] armv8_pmu_device_probe+0x1c/0x28
[ 1.195316] platform_probe+0x5c/0xac
[ 1.195658] really_probe+0xbc/0x298
[ 1.195995] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x12c
[ 1.196399] driver_probe_device+0xdc/0x160
[ 1.196787] __driver_attach+0x94/0x19c
[ 1.197146] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xd4
[ 1.197503] driver_attach+0x24/0x30
[ 1.197838] bus_add_driver+0xe4/0x208
[ 1.198187] driver_register+0x60/0x128
[ 1.198546] __platform_driver_register+0x24/0x30
[ 1.198974] armv8_pmu_driver_init+0x28/0x4c
[ 1.199372] do_one_initcall+0x44/0x25c
[ 1.199729] kernel_init_freeable+0x1dc/0x3bc
[ 1.200134] kernel_init+0x20/0x1d8
[ 1.200466] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
[ 1.200809] Code: 4b020264 eb04007f 54000129 51000402 (f860d825)
[ 1.201355] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Fixes: 5f295519b42f ("smp: Improve locality in smp_call_function_any()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
---
kernel/smp.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 56f83aa58ec8..cbce9699ced6 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -759,7 +759,9 @@ int smp_call_function_any(const struct cpumask *mask,
/* Try for same CPU (cheapest) */
cpu = get_cpu();
- if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask))
+ if (!cpumask_intersects(mask, cpu_online_mask))
+ cpu = nr_cpu_ids;
+ else if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask))
cpu = sched_numa_find_nth_cpu(mask, 0, cpu_to_node(cpu));
ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, wait);
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-08-28 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-28 22:40 Christian Loehle [this message]
2025-09-03 15:53 ` [PATCH] smp: Fix smp_call_function_any() if no CPU online Christian Loehle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e381fd4b-fb90-41ae-a480-0dad1ce2aa9f@arm.com \
--to=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).