From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD0DECDFA1 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 20:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234223AbiJZUmF (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:42:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37012 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233779AbiJZUmB (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:42:01 -0400 Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC0929F35E; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 13:41:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1666816919; x=1698352919; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rBT0PII3za2aGVCQVmX15R78vHrk5mnZYW0vaDCMOXg=; b=m9Yu7TayNxnNrQbNBw64FpM37Z/npEdy94NdL97PG0cKBlxpXIekqH3H 3qu+1Iuv0XH1euQukihYDCPDfmX/AeA5XrRFFuWk96KnxWUoBKoOqPQld Ve0Mg050skleltAxvGm+wNdJrG8HlkGLD0l3LxVFb1yq3HsfFyUXZvLuH 4fSHJsQbkk+w9H8IzJ7JyrSZMhjIMZjFDq+ircR4/oxZZK1fvDhRkb2ju FSvSFu9KmEm4am1JA9YpHwPjXcWMKS865Bbxb6X6n3wn21uss0F+j9DSZ H9v0DxqtEDObQrb6rJc+IIpyDAdwdBH8Ee3DfTA5WVBLOLCA31HuP7un9 Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10512"; a="288450835" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,215,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="288450835" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Oct 2022 13:41:59 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10512"; a="610103296" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,215,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="610103296" Received: from bcoan-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.209.189.197]) ([10.209.189.197]) by orsmga006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Oct 2022 13:41:57 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 15:14:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/102.0 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] soundwire: qcom: add support for v1.7 Soundwire Controller Content-Language: en-US To: Srinivas Kandagatla , vkoul@kernel.org, yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com Cc: andersson@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, sanyog.r.kale@intel.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org References: <20221026110210.6575-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> <20221026110210.6575-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart In-Reply-To: <20221026110210.6575-7-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > @@ -1582,6 +1597,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_swrm_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.3.0", .data = &swrm_v1_3_data }, > { .compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.5.1", .data = &swrm_v1_5_data }, > { .compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.6.0", .data = &swrm_v1_6_data }, > + { .compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.7.0", .data = &swrm_v1_5_data }, is this line intentional, it looks odd that 1.7 is compatible with 1.5, but 1.6 isn't?