From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759112Ab3LGVso (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Dec 2013 16:48:44 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:43612 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755098Ab3LGVsl (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Dec 2013 16:48:41 -0500 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <20131207133048.GA4183@pd.tnic> References: <1385445477-9665-1-git-send-email-dyoung@redhat.com> <1385445477-9665-7-git-send-email-dyoung@redhat.com> <20131127114402.GB32267@pd.tnic> <20131129094034.GI4186@dhcp-16-126.nay.redhat.com> <20131129115029.GB4266@pd.tnic> <20131202025942.GF3999@dhcp-16-126.nay.redhat.com> <20131202094020.GA7380@pd.tnic> <2141297830.13051543.1386406862068.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <20131207133048.GA4183@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/12] efi: export efi runtime memory mapping to sysfs From: "H. Peter Anvin" Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 13:46:33 -0800 To: Borislav Petkov , Dave Young CC: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, toshi kani , matt@console-pimps.org, greg@kroah.com, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Bottomley , horms@verge.net.au, ebiederm@xmission.com, vgoyal@redhat.com Message-ID: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is very good advice indeed. Borislav Petkov wrote: >On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 04:01:02AM -0500, Dave Young wrote: >> Hi, all >> >> Update my status: >> >> I have finished most of thecode related changes including the >krealloc >> fixes (both for original code and my new code). And I'm slowly >> moving the kexec related stuff to efi_kexec.c, this involves >> some other cleanups, such as: >> efi_systab_init: >> -> move 64bit code to efi_64.c, move 32bit code to efi_32.c >> >> efi_setup global variable is changing to physical address, >ioremapping >> it when necessary instead of directly using the virt addr because >> previously the virt addr will be freed until entering virtual mode, >> it's possible a leak in case something is wrong in the middle also it >> occupies the ioremap slot a little bit long. >> >> There's also other problems, so I still need a few days probably >> a week to carefully restructure the code. > >Those are all lofty goals but beware that trying to solve it all at >once can be very painful and can cause unnecessary work for both coders >and reviewers. Especially if the patchset grows out of proportion which >makes it much harder to review and deal with. > >So, from my experience and if I were you, I'd try to address the most >important issue I'm trying to fix, have 10ish nice clean patches and >put >the rest on the TODO list. This is much easier to deal with for >everyone >involved than trying to solve it all at once. > >Besides, if you solve it all at once, what are you going to work on >afterwards? :-) > >HTH. -- Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.