From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: tglx@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Rick P Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/kvm/vmx: Move IRQ/NMI dispatch from KVM into x86 core
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 17:43:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e47f29d5-17f1-47ce-b80e-bfa543f9a712@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260423155936.843498069@infradead.org>
On 4/23/2026 11:56 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Move the VMX interrupt dispatch magic into the x86 core code. This
> isolates KVM from the FRED/IDT decisions and reduces the amount of
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_KVM().
>
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Tested-by: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/entry/Makefile | 2 -
> arch/x86/entry/common.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/entry/entry.S | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/entry/entry_64_fred.S | 1
> arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h | 4 +++
> arch/x86/include/asm/desc_defs.h | 2 -
> arch/x86/include/asm/entry-common.h | 2 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/fred.h | 1
> arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h | 11 --------
> arch/x86/kernel/idt.c | 13 +++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c | 8 ------
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S | 46 ----------------------------------
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 20 ++-------------
> 13 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/Makefile
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ CFLAGS_REMOVE_syscall_64.o = $(CC_FLAGS_
> CFLAGS_syscall_32.o += -fno-stack-protector
> CFLAGS_syscall_64.o += -fno-stack-protector
>
> -obj-y := entry.o entry_$(BITS).o syscall_$(BITS).o
> +obj-y := entry.o entry_$(BITS).o syscall_$(BITS).o common.o
>
> obj-y += vdso/
> obj-y += vsyscall/
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +
> +#include <linux/entry-common.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm_types.h>
> +#include <asm/fred.h>
> +#include <asm/desc.h>
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_INTEL)
> +/*
> + * On VMX, NMIs and IRQs (as configured by KVM) are acknowledge by hardware as
s/acknowledge/acknowledged
> + * part of the VM-Exit, i.e. the event itself is consumed as part the VM-Exit.
> + * x86_entry_from_kvm() is invoked by KVM to effectively forward NMIs and IRQs
> + * to the kernel for servicing. On SVM, a.k.a. AMD, the NMI/IRQ VM-Exit is
> + * purely a signal that an NMI/IRQ is pending, i.e. the event that triggered
> + * the VM-Exit is held pending until it's unblocked in the host.
> + */
[...]
> -
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_INTEL)
> -/*
> - * Special entry point for VMX which invokes this on the kernel stack, even for
> - * 64-bit, i.e. without using an IST. asm_exc_nmi() requires an IST to work
Although it's being removed, I guess what it says is still true?
It says asm_exc_nmi() requires an IST to work correctly, and the new path for
handling NMI when FRED is disabled.
idt_entry_from_kvm
idt_do_nmi_irqoff
IDT_DO_EVENT_IRQOFF call asm_exc_nmi
...
call asm_exc_nmi
It seems the stack before calling asm_exc_nmi is not an IST?
Does it matter?
> - * correctly vs. the NMI 'executing' marker. Used for 32-bit kernels as well
> - * to avoid more ifdeffery.
> - */
> -DECLARE_IDTENTRY(X86_TRAP_NMI, exc_nmi_kvm_vmx);
> -#endif
> -
> DECLARE_IDTENTRY_NMI(X86_TRAP_NMI, exc_nmi);
> #ifdef CONFIG_XEN_PV
> DECLARE_IDTENTRY_RAW(X86_TRAP_NMI, xenpv_exc_nmi);
[...]
> @@ -7127,17 +7124,9 @@ static void handle_external_interrupt_ir
> "unexpected VM-Exit interrupt info: 0x%x", intr_info))
> return;
>
> - /*
> - * Invoke the kernel's IRQ handler for the vector. Use the FRED path
> - * when it's available even if FRED isn't fully enabled, e.g. even if
> - * FRED isn't supported in hardware, in order to avoid the indirect
> - * CALL in the non-FRED path.
> - */
> + /* For the IRQ to the core kernel for processing. */
For -> Forward?
> kvm_before_interrupt(vcpu, KVM_HANDLING_IRQ);
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_FRED))
> - fred_entry_from_kvm(EVENT_TYPE_EXTINT, vector);
> - else
> - vmx_do_interrupt_irqoff(gate_offset((gate_desc *)host_idt_base + vector));
> + x86_entry_from_kvm(EVENT_TYPE_EXTINT, vector);
> kvm_after_interrupt(vcpu);
>
> vcpu->arch.at_instruction_boundary = true;
> @@ -7447,10 +7436,7 @@ noinstr void vmx_handle_nmi(struct kvm_v
> return;
>
> kvm_before_interrupt(vcpu, KVM_HANDLING_NMI);
> - if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_FRED))
> - fred_entry_from_kvm(EVENT_TYPE_NMI, NMI_VECTOR);
> - else
> - vmx_do_nmi_irqoff();
> + x86_entry_from_kvm(EVENT_TYPE_NMI, NMI_VECTOR);
> kvm_after_interrupt(vcpu);
> }
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-28 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-23 15:56 [PATCH 0/2] x86/kvm/vmx: Fix VMX interrupt injection vs hrtimer_rearm_deferred() Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-23 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/kvm/vmx: Move IRQ/NMI dispatch from KVM into x86 core Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-23 17:54 ` Xin Li
2026-04-28 9:43 ` Binbin Wu [this message]
2026-04-28 11:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-01 20:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v2 " Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-23 15:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/kvm/vmx: Fix VMX vs hrtimer_rearm_deferred() Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e47f29d5-17f1-47ce-b80e-bfa543f9a712@linux.intel.com \
--to=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@intel.com \
--cc=bonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox