From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Huang Shijie <shijie@os.amperecomputing.com>,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org
Cc: patches@amperecomputing.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, thuth@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
xiongwei.song@windriver.com, ardb@kernel.org,
steven.price@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, cl@os.amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: add a new document for the fine-tuning tips
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:26:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e48df345-0946-4b34-a463-e89aa89680f9@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241126085647.4993-5-shijie@os.amperecomputing.com>
On 11/26/24 14:26, Huang Shijie wrote:
> Put some fine-tuning tips in this file:
> 1.) rodata=noalias
> 2.) slab_strict_numa
> 3.) CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER
>
> We can add more tips in future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
> Documentation/arch/arm64/fine-tuning-tips.rst | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
> Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/arch/arm64/fine-tuning-tips.rst
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/fine-tuning-tips.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/fine-tuning-tips.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..70ef1cef92fb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/fine-tuning-tips.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +================
> +fine-tuning tips
> +================
> +
> +This file contains some fine-tuning tips for arm64 machines.
> +These tips do not gurantee that you can get better performance,
> +but you can try them with your workload.
> +
> +rodata=noalias
> +----------------
> +It can provide us more block mappings and contiguous hits
> +to map the linear region which minimizes the TLB footprint.
> +
> +slab_strict_numa
> +----------------
> +In NUMA, it will provide the local memory allocation by SLUB.
> +
> +CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER
> +----------------
> +Some arm64 machines have cpu core cluster, enable it may
> +helps you get better performance.
> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst
> index 6a012c98bdcd..36d1ef09bd71 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ ARM64 Architecture
> cpu-feature-registers
> cpu-hotplug
> elf_hwcaps
> + fine-tuning-tips
> gcs
> hugetlbpage
> kdump
Although the idea for such a file makes sense, to help system admins
tune the kernel command line for required behaviour, I am concerned
about the overall structure and scope for such a document. Should it
contain tips regarding all the subsystems on the platform, till what
extent these details should be described in there and then there are
so many aspects for a required behaviour etc ?
Besides maintaining such a document might also be very difficult as
well given how implementations will change over time thus requiring
different tuning etc. Hence kernel source might not be a place for
such a document.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-06 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-26 8:56 [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: refactor the rodata=xxx Huang Shijie
2024-11-26 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: make rodata=on behaviour be the original rodata=full Huang Shijie
2024-12-06 4:21 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-11-26 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: remove CONFIG_RODATA_FULL_DEFAULT_ENABLED Huang Shijie
2024-12-06 4:40 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-11-26 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: introduce rodata=noalias Huang Shijie
2024-12-06 4:29 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-12-06 5:50 ` Shijie Huang
2024-11-26 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: add a new document for the fine-tuning tips Huang Shijie
2024-12-02 19:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2024-12-06 3:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/4 fix] " Huang Shijie
2024-12-06 3:56 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2024-12-06 6:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] " Shijie Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e48df345-0946-4b34-a463-e89aa89680f9@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=patches@amperecomputing.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shijie@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xiongwei.song@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox