From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A4AF55C08; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 22:52:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719960743; cv=none; b=sbGS4POS+DXCpVm1hveoB1KUQDxDrfFvhjmyLUXx/nx38UJEJshMcqki8HCkJqTR3RrA4FpEE9ENehL6LSvhF4uLfj1oW0/bWLrGmBhbGmJRaWh11apiNR4zus5wi1lzy6S7o9L8iBjjfe2aZd/eepXdS4NihAyM7MuLs/d83eI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719960743; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EeliZOwnWyqJK3pXzEfb3LY6JKmWA2NykWMeMiWGrPQ=; h=Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:From:Cc:To:Date; b=malsy3RmX7FlCsljxlZajHO2cH/khh0c5bpMyyxlN6f4oKuVxhqPhRF9MJwbNOyDdM/oXTXkPL+4n5d3Rp4R7aRO1HkxT8ClKFzbI+YZeIDVwULeKrN8ZZFyY5avNx/pWfuWuLPhUJJFiuDCqbi0HVeIift2rESp9ldi5Rdgz48= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WKwm+93S; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WKwm+93S" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2DE4C116B1; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 22:52:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1719960742; bh=EeliZOwnWyqJK3pXzEfb3LY6JKmWA2NykWMeMiWGrPQ=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=WKwm+93SyUDuMwfU+0zDVdczXvuJlxiByBRxSUlTPmQAeXgax61xTy7pjZ/Biwc43 9yi4mYgdZeU6bE2qGSl2cyCD7NhXAX3d2iQEI97gtIorSK10LrHFkiBeLMP2bnFven kTWe4KhRpgMf3yl0DubC6t+9xG6VVsPddBqzvtnp6mByIP6+goK83q3NTU0QsTQqEv xkhd48J4ZQ8RG/tr+wYeI+7yXaHbRcEN3qYI1Jb9eofXJImuPQq0sDLqQ37NS2yvyX 1zr9P5Ws6YIwRCfMEyUVRvZ3WGKeLCnMYb41vdJyz3C97xJ3937PbBHuEXVAECXgtW geWRcdpeKfbdw== Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20240702125539.524489-1-audra@redhat.com> References: <20240702125539.524489-1-audra@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable Clk-gate_tests for s390 From: Stephen Boyd Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npache@redhat.com, raquini@redhat.com To: Audra Mitchell , kunit-dev@googlegroups.com Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 15:52:20 -0700 User-Agent: alot/0.10 Quoting Audra Mitchell (2024-07-02 05:55:39) > Currently clk-gate tests for s390 fail as the tests create a pretend > clk-gate and use a "fake_reg" to emulate the expected behavior of the > clk_gate->reg. I added some debug statements to the driver and noticed > that the reg changes after initialization to -1, which is coming from > an error coming from zpci_load(). This is likely because the test is > using fake iomem and the s390 architecture likely isn't designed to > handle that. Turn off the clk-gate tests for s390 for now as there is > no clear work around for this problem as discussed in upstream > conversation [1]. >=20 > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/301cd41e6283c12ac67fb8c0f8d5c929.sboyd@ke= rnel.org/T/#t >=20 > Signed-off-by: Audra Mitchell > --- Applied to clk-next