From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752079AbXB0Tf2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:35:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752505AbXB0Tf2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:35:28 -0500 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:60998 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752079AbXB0Tf0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:35:26 -0500 From: Andy Whitcroft To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft , Mel Gorman Subject: [PATCH 3/5] lumpy: ensure that we compare PageActive and active safely References: InReply-To: Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:35:23 -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Now that we are passing in a boolean active flag we need to ensure that the result of PageActive(page) is comparible to that boolean. Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft --- diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index b878d54..2bfad79 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -632,7 +632,12 @@ static int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, int active) { int ret = -EINVAL; - if (PageLRU(page) && (PageActive(page) == active)) { + /* + * When checking the active state, we need to be sure we are + * dealing with comparible boolean values. Take the logical not + * of each. + */ + if (PageLRU(page) && (!PageActive(page) == !active)) { ret = -EBUSY; if (likely(get_page_unless_zero(page))) { /*