Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel

Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-18T10:24:08Z

On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 01:56:14PM +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> At least reiser4 is smaller. IIRC xfs is older than reiser4 and had more time
> to optimize code size, but:
>
> reiser4 2557872 bytes
> xfs 3306782 bytes

and romfs is smaller than ext2, damn. Should we remove all filesystems but
romfs now?

and yeah, if you didn't get the hint compare the feature sets.