public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Evgeniy Baskov <baskov@ispras.ru>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] x86_64: Harden compressed kernel, part 1
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 09:48:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6e7fef1-0dff-ef72-8a17-8ecec89994ca@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1659369873.git.baskov@ispras.ru>

On 8/1/22 09:38, Evgeniy Baskov wrote:
> This is the first half of changes aimed to increase security of early
> boot code of compressed kernel for x86_64 by enforcing memory protection
> on page table level.

Could you share a little more background here?  Hardening is good, but
you _can_ have too much of a good thing.

Is this part of the boot cycle becoming a target for attackers in
trusted boot environments?  Do emerging confidential computing
technologies like SEV and TDX cause increased reliance on compressed
kernel security?

In other words, why is *THIS* important versus all the other patches
floating around out there?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-01 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-01 16:38 [RFC PATCH 0/8] x86_64: Harden compressed kernel, part 1 Evgeniy Baskov
2022-08-01 16:38 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86/boot: Align vmlinuz sections on page size Evgeniy Baskov
2022-08-01 16:38 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/build: Remove RWX sections and align on 4KB Evgeniy Baskov
2022-08-01 16:39 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/boot: Set cr0 to known state in trampoline Evgeniy Baskov
2022-08-01 16:39 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/boot: Increase boot page table size Evgeniy Baskov
2022-08-01 16:39 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86/boot: Support 4KB pages for identity mapping Evgeniy Baskov
2022-08-01 16:39 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/boot: Setup memory protection for bzImage code Evgeniy Baskov
2022-08-01 16:39 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86/boot: Map memory explicitly Evgeniy Baskov
2022-08-01 16:39 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/boot: Remove mapping from page fault handler Evgeniy Baskov
2022-08-01 16:48 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2022-08-02  0:25   ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] x86_64: Harden compressed kernel, part 1 Evgeniy Baskov
2022-08-02  2:41     ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-02 23:45       ` Evgeniy Baskov
2022-08-03 14:05         ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-04 10:41           ` Evgeniy Baskov
2022-08-04 11:22             ` Greg KH
2022-08-04 14:26               ` Evgeniy Baskov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e6e7fef1-0dff-ef72-8a17-8ecec89994ca@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=baskov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=khoroshilov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox