From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967059AbeEXMtb (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2018 08:49:31 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f195.google.com ([209.85.128.195]:44979 "EHLO mail-wr0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965230AbeEXMt0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2018 08:49:26 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZo0ffeU5b+PaIK/TQgjyWHIk7RSbf4kmoPgMdV2cXxh+iEgXKUdsxmdvljOAjTeAtVvcPiU7A== Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] cpufreq: tegra20: Use PLL_C as intermediate clock source To: Peter De Schrijver Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180523160020.15291-1-digetx@gmail.com> <20180523160020.15291-2-digetx@gmail.com> <20180524100413.GL6835@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> From: Dmitry Osipenko Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=digetx@gmail.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsBNBFpX5TwBCADQhg+lBnTunWSPbP5I+rM9q6EKPm5fu2RbqyVAh/W3fRvLyghdb58Yrmjm KpDYUhBIZvAQoFLEL1IPAgJBtmPvemO1XUGPxfYNh/3BlcDFBAgERrI3BfA/6pk7SAFn8u84 p+J1TW4rrPYcusfs44abJrn8CH0GZKt2AZIsGbGQ79O2HHXKHr9V95ZEPWH5AR0UtL6wxg6o O56UNG3rIzSL5getRDQW3yCtjcqM44mz6GPhSE2sxNgqureAbnzvr4/93ndOHtQUXPzzTrYB z/WqLGhPdx5Ouzn0Q0kSVCQiqeExlcQ7i7aKRRrELz/5/IXbCo2O+53twlX8xOps9iMfABEB AAHNIkRtaXRyeSBPc2lwZW5rbyA8ZGlnZXR4QGdtYWlsLmNvbT7CwJQEEwEIAD4WIQSczHcO 3uc4K1eb3yvTNNaPsNRzvAUCWlflPAIbAwUJA8JnAAULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIX gAAKCRDTNNaPsNRzvFjTCACqAh1M9/YPq73/ai5h2ExDquTgJnjegL8KL2yHL3G+XINwzN5E nPI7esoYm+zVWDJbv3UuRqylpookLNSRA01yyvkaMcipB/B128UnqmUiGRqezj9QE20yIauo uHRuwHPE2q+UkfUhRX9iuOaEyQtZDiCa0myMjmRkJ+Z8ZetclEPG8dYZu47w04phuMlu1QAt a0gkZOaMKvXgj21ushALS6nYnvm7HiIPQXfnEXThartatRvFdmbG4PCn0IoICkQBizwJtXrL HEjELIFap0M8krVJlUoZTFaZnaZkGpUDWikeFtAuie2KuIxmVBYPM4X7pM3eP3AVvIPGS7EE UUFuzsBNBFpX5TwBCADFNDou220thijaLLGaQsebWjzc/gPRxMixIpk856MRyRaQin+IbGD6 YskMb5ZSD3nS88LIKNfY4MMH0LwfYztI++ICG2vdFLkbBt78E+LqEa+kZ9072l4W5KO3mWQo +jMfxXbpgGlc7iuEReDgl8iyZ27r51kSW665CYvvu2YJhLqgdj6QM1lN2D1UnhEhkkU+pRAj 1rJVOxdfJaQNQS4+204p3TrURovzNGkN/brqakpNIcqGOAGQqb8F0tuwwuP7ERq/BzDNkbdr qJOrVC/wkHRq1jfabQczWKf8MwYOvivR3HY8d3CpSQxmUXDtdOWfg0XGm1dxYnVfqPjuJaZt ABEBAAHCwHwEGAEIACYWIQSczHcO3uc4K1eb3yvTNNaPsNRzvAUCWlflPAIbDAUJA8JnAAAK CRDTNNaPsNRzvJzuB/9d+sxcwHbO8ZDcgaLX9N+bXFqN9fIRVmBUyWa+qqTSREA4uVAtYcRT lfPE2OQ7aMFxaYPwo+/z5SLpu8HcEhN/FG9uIkfYwK0mdCO0vgvlfvBJm4VHe7C6vyAeEPJQ DKbBvdgeqFqO+PsLkk2sawF/9sontMJ5iFfjNDj4UeAo4VsdlduTBZv5hHFvIbv/p7jKH6OT 90FsgUSVbShh7SH5OzAcgqSy4kxuS1AHizWo6P3f9vei987LZWTyhuEuhJsOfivDsjKIq7qQ c5eR+JJtyLEA0Jt4cQGhpzHtWB0yB3XxXzHVa4QUp00BNVWyiJ/t9JHT4S5mdyLfcKm7ddc9 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 15:49:22 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180524100413.GL6835@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 24.05.2018 13:04, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 07:00:20PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> PLL_C is running at 600MHz which is significantly higher than the 216MHz >> of the PLL_P and it is known that PLL_C is always-ON because AHB BUS is >> running on that PLL. Let's use PLL_C as intermediate clock source, making >> CPU snappier a tad during of the frequency transition. >> > > pll_c isn't necessarily 600Mhz when used as a source for the second display > head. Hmm, indeed. Even if PLL_C rate will be adjusted, it will be higher than the PLL_P.. won't it? That's likely to be good enough. Do you know if any of the available CCLK parents has a glitch-less rate switching? I.e. CPU won't hang on the rate switch. There is other possible 600MHz source, the PLL_M. Can we use it? This one also may become dynamic if we'll consider implementing the memory scaling, but the memory frequency probably will fit the transition role pretty well.