Re: clocksource

john stultz
2006-06-16T03:35:49Z

On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 20:21 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> Very cool. I appreciate the small incremental patches. I've looked over
> them and am trying to see which ones make sense in light of the
> following info.

Ah, forgot to mention that the patch included the changes from your p1
fix (some of which I had already made, but items like the
clocksource_adj() name change is a clear improvement).

And just to be sure you know I'm not brushing your patches off: I'm
looking at patches p2, p4, p5 and p7 as the next steps, and after I get
some feedback on the patch I just sent we can discuss p3,p6, and p8.

Sound good?

thanks
-john