public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	hpa@zytor.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] x86/split_lock: Re-define the kernel param option for split_lock_detect
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:38:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e708f6d2-8f96-903c-0bce-2eeecc4a237d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r1xjov3a.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

On 3/24/2020 1:10 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com> writes:
> 
>> Change sld_off to sld_disable, which means disabling feature split lock
>> detection and it cannot be used in kernel nor can kvm expose it guest.
>> Of course, the X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT is not set.
>>
>> Add a new optioin sld_kvm_only, which means kernel turns split lock
>> detection off, but kvm can expose it to guest.
> 
> What's the point of this? If the host is not clean, then you better fix
> the host first before trying to expose it to guests.

It's not about whether or not host is clean. It's for the cases that 
users just don't want it enabled on host, to not break the applications 
or drivers that do have split lock issue.

> Thanks,
> 
>          tglx
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-24  1:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-15  5:05 [PATCH v5 0/9] x86/split_lock: Add feature split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-15  5:05 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] x86/split_lock: Rework the initialization flow of " Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-21  0:41   ` Luck, Tony
2020-03-23 17:02   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-23 20:24     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24  1:10       ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 10:29         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-25  0:18           ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-25  0:52             ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 11:51     ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 13:31       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-15  5:05 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] x86/split_lock: Avoid runtime reads of the TEST_CTRL MSR Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-21  0:43   ` Luck, Tony
2020-03-23 17:06     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-23 17:06   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24  1:16     ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-15  5:05 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] x86/split_lock: Re-define the kernel param option for split_lock_detect Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-21  0:46   ` Luck, Tony
2020-03-23 17:10   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24  1:38     ` Xiaoyao Li [this message]
2020-03-24 10:40       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 18:02         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-24 18:42           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-25  0:43         ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-25  1:03           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-15  5:05 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] x86/split_lock: Export handle_user_split_lock() Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-21  0:48   ` Luck, Tony
2020-03-15  5:05 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] kvm: x86: Emulate split-lock access as a write Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-15  5:05 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] kvm: vmx: Extend VMX's #AC interceptor to handle split lock #AC happens in guest Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-15  5:05 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] kvm: x86: Emulate MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-15  5:05 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] kvm: vmx: Enable MSR_TEST_CTRL for intel guest Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-15  5:05 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] x86: vmx: virtualize split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-23  2:18 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] x86/split_lock: Add feature " Xiaoyao Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e708f6d2-8f96-903c-0bce-2eeecc4a237d@intel.com \
    --to=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox