From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752070AbdLJMd1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Dec 2017 07:33:27 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:59761 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751720AbdLJMdX (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Dec 2017 07:33:23 -0500 Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_iio/=e2=80=a6:_Use_common_error_handling_code?= To: Jonathan Cameron , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Hans de Goede , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler References: <5ab7e200-2dea-63e2-06db-0e185f563d16@users.sourceforge.net> <0f26a13b-7bbf-525b-a864-8aa8e13c3aef@users.sourceforge.net> <20171026174200.5c00b06d@archlinux> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 13:33:01 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171026174200.5c00b06d@archlinux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:egOVbVggj7n/gqij9edRpM+EYOsz5S9OmJ5EANNKcJHA9GF/frp 0bgmrodymFsDN0c8C8agzaqma6MryNV8Fxmy1IYPLRikDJjI5VlU8GfnJ4P3c+fA/es98oT Flmlr8Abl4GxJXZsNhohiXazriordGJKSF6SN6NX0DqykAWifjQHMKvpnJAerEeXOoDuAvs U4PuSesDPIow8tR6q+87A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:8GD8AnP9rmw=:g5zOvBNtP6rSo+9qAb9H08 1vdBqxSEOuwr1lPCtwsQX/p/R03Y6IyoyqFo1LOl+wn7/JTpPmW/oDtptcvSOW1MaKqlxT1+q p/8HWNUpvt/PmdLGsLjMW4UXfx7o6H3UCh6wfOcZZ07LbA5vTw1MOebr9zB1QBOVFnbkNM7ls +CJqp3kNjy110UqmHRM7a70dMgK3jkAz2UrRYrlRIedgU1EvMhsQj9wCnxPEgeckCj47G01DS tXt8cZG9ldLEtARFf6jidjBeMcjrSFQZx5tqTBgbgFQ65JbEJEMAY54QMpCxjwgzfDwgF7S3f CzJkCITqO0qfHo3UeOYlD4flaMLbJ89fKQqeoRp9aQ3vIRIVioaCD9c6aenGLGQQL7P6nZdvG sNfYFpIqT06INmnwR3RGWwsgC0WXQU0OiP4DNBBPLM5mbjOM7/Za3Tqoa33jWRkQ0L5UIQd7P BSTU/iQrzq6Ie+f6XAg4p46Iq9Jvazxyzyc5Zxw4r3ViTOYri1waMboaXrsjYCgSU/QNsRoAU agCAx0uMLNv95kd/REmeo1SGEXB4YREsSEjZhiu1GmD4TvjLtVnEl/PH2jpgMoKuCbnzTBcvw m/gOJg2a5kkjgcLenkozH4tBGFWdMJePXH7inJYreMjrvvIsZJdSm3E4H3NAoOJ3QkThXOxbG YDvQdJH//A4OWWOiLw7ESs4LhhAVyoRPg2qQmvzBgCyDmOWFUjyiMHWnwiLVawQ6Hw34mzk0O Upd8sbB0NZ4/TOp2mwIbI2OPLVEleBo258FmUzAuQo2vDQwvA1gEfDYPrnEcnuBbEx4gwEE7w KavVtVHlo2eN52EXiTXTapE3ajO+HsU6ES2LmigsApB0wN23o4= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Again, a general kernel development rule is to float only one > patch of a given type until you have had feedback on it. A few weeks later … > As I said in one of the other patches, I always reply to all > patches I am rejecting so that anyone coming across them later > on their own from an archive or similar can immediately see the > reasons why they are a bad idea without having to know the mailing > list context. Can you get into the mood to clarify any remaining change possibilities a bit more? Regards, Markus