Re: [RFC 2/8] iommufd: replace attach_fn with a structure

[Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>]

On 9/26/23 5:26 PM, Yi Liu wrote:
> Most of the core logic before conducting the actual device attach/
> replace operation can be shared with pasid attach/replace. Create
> a new structure so more information (e.g. pasid) can be later added
> along with the attach_fn.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Tian<kevin.tian@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu<yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c          | 35 ++++++++++++++++---------
>   drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h |  8 ++++++
>   2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
> index 645ab5d290fe..4fa4153c5df7 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
> @@ -597,8 +597,11 @@ iommufd_device_do_replace(struct iommufd_device *idev,
>   	return ERR_PTR(rc);
>   }
>   
> -typedef struct iommufd_hw_pagetable *(*attach_fn)(
> -	struct iommufd_device *idev, struct iommufd_hw_pagetable *hwpt);
> +static struct iommufd_hw_pagetable *do_attach(struct iommufd_device *idev,
> +		struct iommufd_hw_pagetable *hwpt, struct attach_data *data)
> +{
> +	return data->attach_fn(idev, hwpt);
> +}

I assume that this change was made because we need to pass the pasid
value to the attach_fn() callback.

If so, how about passing it directly to attach_fn() function?

typedef struct iommufd_hw_pagetable *(*attach_fn)(
		struct iommufd_device *idev,
		struct iommufd_hw_pagetable *hwpt,
		ioasid_t pasid);

In no pasid case, use IOMMU_NO_PASID.

Best regards,
baolu