public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Cc: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/10] bpf: Verifier support for KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 20:08:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e796df2b-6dd9-4b45-b8fb-9ef9f7fceab6@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5027595d4eff50d423af8ebc5fecd6a0f7229d60.camel@gmail.com>



On 1/13/26 5:06 PM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2026-01-13 at 16:03 -0800, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
>> On 1/13/26 1:59 PM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2026-01-09 at 10:48 -0800, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>>>> @@ -3271,6 +3271,38 @@ static struct btf *find_kfunc_desc_btf(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, s16 offset)
>>>>  	return btf_vmlinux ?: ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>>>>  }
>>>>  
>>>> +#define KF_IMPL_SUFFIX "_impl"
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct btf_type *find_kfunc_impl_proto(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>>>> +						    struct btf *btf,
>>>> +						    const char *func_name)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	char impl_name[KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN];
>>>
>>> Oh, as we discussed already, this should use env->tmp_str_buf.
>>
>> The env->tmp_str_buf size is smaller:
>>
>> 	#define TMP_STR_BUF_LEN 320
>>
>> *And* there is already a local char buffer of size KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN
>> already in use in verifier.c:
>>
>> 	int bpf_check_attach_target(...) {
>> 		bool prog_extension = prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT;
>> 		bool prog_tracing = prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING;
>> 		char trace_symbol[KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN];
>> 	[...]
>>
>> Since these are function names, the real limit is KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN,
>> right?
>>
>> Sure >320 chars long kfunc name is unlikely, but technically possible.
> 
> 320 is good enough, you'll be able to cover this:
> 
> kfunc_trace_long_descriptive_kernel_symbol_for_tracing_scheduler_memory_io_and_interrupt_paths_during_runtime_analysis_of_latency_throughput_and_resource_contention_on_large_scale_multiprocessor_linux_systems_using_bpf_and_kprobes_without_requiring_kernel_recompilation_or_system_restart_for_production_use_cases_v2x
> 
> But not this:
> 
> kfunc_trace_kernel_scheduler_and_memory_management_path_for_observing_task_lifecycle_events_context_switches_page_fault_handling_and_io_wait_states_while_debugging_performance_regressions_on_large_multiprocessor_systems_running_preemptible_linux_kernels_with_bpf_tracing_and_dynamic_instrumentation_enabled_for_deep_visibility_into_runtime_behavior_and_latency_sensitive_code_paths_without_recompilation.
> 
> Should suffice, I think.

I will laugh for at least 321 seconds when the size of this buffer
will have to be increased, and will make sure you hear it :)

They thought 640K of memory is enough, you know.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-14  4:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-09 18:48 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/10] bpf: Kernel functions with KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-09 18:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/10] bpf: Refactor btf_kfunc_id_set_contains Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-13 21:43   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-01-09 18:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/10] bpf: Introduce struct bpf_kfunc_meta Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-13 21:46   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-01-09 18:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/10] bpf: Verifier support for KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-09 19:54   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-01-09 23:25   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-13 20:39   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-01-13 22:03     ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-13 23:48       ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-14  0:55         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-01-14  3:57           ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-14  1:35         ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-01-13 21:59   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-01-14  0:03     ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-14  1:06       ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-01-14  4:08         ` Ihor Solodrai [this message]
2026-01-09 18:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/10] resolve_btfids: Support " Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-09 19:15   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-09 19:34     ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-09 23:25   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-10  1:15     ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-12 16:51       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-13  1:49         ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-13 16:55           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-09 18:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/10] selftests/bpf: Add tests " Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-09 23:25   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-10  1:29     ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-12 16:55       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-09 18:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/10] bpf: Add bpf_wq_set_callback kfunc with KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-09 18:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/10] HID: Use bpf_wq_set_callback kernel function Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-09 21:34   ` Benjamin Tissoires
2026-01-09 18:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/10] bpf: Add bpf_task_work_schedule_* kfuncs with KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-09 19:58   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-01-09 20:02     ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-09 20:47       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-01-09 21:39         ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-09 21:49           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-01-09 21:56             ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-12 18:53               ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-12 22:43                 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-09 18:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/10] bpf: Add bpf_stream_vprintk " Ihor Solodrai
2026-01-09 18:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/10] bpf,docs: Document KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS flag Ihor Solodrai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e796df2b-6dd9-4b45-b8fb-9ef9f7fceab6@linux.dev \
    --to=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bentiss@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yatsenko@meta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox