Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: arm: cpus: Add compatible qcom,oryon-1-5

Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-14T07:11:42Z

On 14/04/2026 08:59, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 08:23:12AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 14/04/2026 03:21, Shawn Guo wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 06:08:49PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 13/04/2026 16:34, Shawn Guo wrote:
>>>>> In short, there will be Nord DTS using the binding coming, and I do not
>>>>
>>>> Maybe there will, maybe there will not.
>>>>
>>>>> think posting them at the same time should be a requirement.
>>>>
>>>> Well, it is a requirement as I explained previously, said that
>>>> *multiple* times on the mailing list, documented expectations in
>>>> mentioned/linked email threads.
>>>
>>> To be honest, I can only read the following from mentioned email
>>> threads.
>>>
>>> - Binding and DTS should be organized in separate series per subsystem
>>> - DTS should reference binding series by a lore link
>>>
>>
>> The links told explicitly to organize series per subsystem/maintainer.
>> Who is the subsystem here?
>
> Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> appears at the top of get_maintainer.pl
> output, so I guess it's DT/Rob?

If you guess, then why did you post it separately from the other patches
targeting Rob?

But you mentioned oryon-2-3 compatible. Who applied it? Rob? Who applied
Kryo? Or Samsung Mongoose?

I explained you the rule - bindings go with the subsystem and you post
everything targeting subsystem in one patchset. This was explicitly
asked for in my referenced postings. The SoC is the primary subsystem here.

Best regards,
Krzysztof