From: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@bootlin.com>
To: "José Expósito" <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>
Cc: hamohammed.sa@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch, melissa.srw@gmail.com,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@gmail.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/16] drm/vkms: Allow to configure multiple planes via configfs
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 11:34:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e813ac5b-298c-4863-b0b6-e9ac7fec1da0@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z8VtPMzuZOYqjraQ@fedora>
Le 03/03/2025 à 09:50, José Expósito a écrit :
> Hi Louis,
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 03:43:25PM +0100, Louis Chauvet wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 25/02/2025 à 18:59, José Expósito a écrit :
>>> Create a default subgroup at /config/vkms/planes to allow to create as
>>> many planes as required.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@bootlin.com>
>>> Co-developed-by: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@bootlin.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@bootlin.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: José Expósito <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>
>>> [...]
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_configfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_configfs.c
>>> index 92512d52ddae..4f9d3341e6c0 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_configfs.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_configfs.c
>>> [...]
>>> +static void plane_release(struct config_item *item)
>>> +{
>>> + struct vkms_configfs_plane *plane;
>>> + struct mutex *lock;
>>> +
>>> + plane = plane_item_to_vkms_configfs_plane(item);
>>> + lock = &plane->dev->lock;
>>> +
>>> + guard(mutex)(lock);
>>> + vkms_config_destroy_plane(plane->config);
>>> + kfree(plane);
>>> +}
>>
>> I just found a flaw in our work: there is currently no way to forbid the
>> deletion of item/symlinks...
>>
>> If you do:
>>
>> modprobe vkms
>> cd /sys/kernel/config/vkms/
>> mkdir DEV
>> mkdir DEV/connectors/CON
>> mkdir DEV/planes/PLA
>> mkdir DEV/crtcs/CRT
>> mkdir DEV/encoders/ENC
>> ln -s DEV/crtcs/CRT DEV/planes/PLA/possible_crtcs/
>> ln -s DEV/crtcs/CRT DEV/encoders/ENC/possible_crtcs
>> ln -s DEV/encoders/ENC DEV/connectors/CON/possible_encoders
>> echo 1 > DEV/planes/PLA/type
>> tree
>> echo 1 > DEV/enabled
>> modetest -M vkms
>> => everything fine
>>
>> rm DEV/connectors/CON/possible_encoders/ENC
>> rmdir DEV/connectors/CON
>> modetest -M vkms
>> => BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free
>>
>>
>> I see two solutions:
>> - we don't care and keep as is: if the device is enabled, and you delete
>> link/groups, it is your fault. As shown above: it can crash the kernel, so
>> it is a no-go.
>
> I was aware of this limitation and, since the configfs is clear about
> deleting items: [1]
>
> Important:
> drop_item() is void, and as such cannot fail. When rmdir(2) is called,
> configfs WILL remove the item from the filesystem tree (assuming that
> it has no children to keep it busy).
> The subsystem is responsible for responding to this. [...]
Thanks for pointing out. I read it and I think you're right, they
clearly want the user space to be able to delete any item at any time.
> I decided to follow this approach, i.e., allowing the user to delete the items.
I think a simple fix would be to have something like that:
int device_enabled_store(...) {
if enabled == True:
for item in configfs_items:
configfs_get_item(item);
vkms_device_enable(...)
else:
vkms_device_disable(...)
for item in configfs_items:
configfs_put_item(item)
}
void device_release(...) {
if enable == True:
vkms_device_disable(...)
for item in configfs_items:
configfs_put_item(item)
}
This way:
- no change in VKMS code
- no ConfigFS change
- we never have use-after-free (at least in my head)
- we never "lose" a DRM device
I did not test it, there is maybe some issue in this implementation (the
"for item in configfs_items" may be a bit complex to write for example).
> However, that use-after-free is a bug I need to fix. I was wondering how I didn't
> catch it with IGT... Turns out, I didn't enable Kasan in my QEMU .config (ops!).
>
> Do you agree on folowing this solution? If so, I'll send v3 fixing the memory
> issues.
Indeed yes! If possible, I would like to avoid "complex" refcount/mutex
in vkms_config structure, but if my proposition does not work, feel free
to add whatever you think relevant!
Thanks a lot,
Louis Chauvet
> Best wishes,
> Jose
>
> [1] https://docs.kernel.org/filesystems/configfs.html
>
>> - we care and we don't want to touch configfs: we need to implement a kind
>> of refcount for all vkms_config elements. Issue: non-trivial work, may allow
>> memory leaks/use after free...
>>
>> - we care and we want to touch configfs: see my two patches (they apply on
>> the v1 of this series). This solution allows adding a check before removing
>> configfs item/group/link. I found it cleaner and way easier to understand.
>>
>> What do you think about my proposition? Do you have another idea?
>>
>>> +static struct configfs_item_operations plane_item_operations = {
>>> + .release = &plane_release,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct config_item_type plane_item_type = {
>>> + .ct_item_ops = &plane_item_operations,
>>> + .ct_owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct config_group *make_plane_group(struct config_group *group,
>>> + const char *name)
>>> +{
>>> + struct vkms_configfs_device *dev;
>>> + struct vkms_configfs_plane *plane;
>>> +
>>> + dev = child_group_to_vkms_configfs_device(group);
>>> +
>>> + guard(mutex)(&dev->lock);
>>> +
>>> + if (dev->enabled)
>>> + return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
>>> +
>>> + plane = kzalloc(sizeof(*plane), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!plane)
>>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>> +
>>> + plane->dev = dev;
>>> +
>>> + plane->config = vkms_config_create_plane(dev->config);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(plane->config)) {
>>> + kfree(plane);
>>> + return ERR_CAST(plane->config);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + config_group_init_type_name(&plane->group, name, &plane_item_type);
>>> +
>>> + return &plane->group;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static struct configfs_group_operations planes_group_operations = {
>>> + .make_group = &make_plane_group,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct config_item_type plane_group_type = {
>>> + .ct_group_ops = &planes_group_operations,
>>> + .ct_owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> static ssize_t device_enabled_show(struct config_item *item, char *page)
>>> {
>>> struct vkms_configfs_device *dev;
>>> @@ -125,6 +208,10 @@ static struct config_group *make_device_group(struct config_group *group,
>>> config_group_init_type_name(&dev->group, name, &device_item_type);
>>> mutex_init(&dev->lock);
>>> + config_group_init_type_name(&dev->planes_group, "planes",
>>> + &plane_group_type);
>>> + configfs_add_default_group(&dev->planes_group, &dev->group);
>>> +
>>> return &dev->group;
>>> }
>>
>> --
>> Louis Chauvet, Bootlin
>> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
>> https://bootlin.com
>>
--
Louis Chauvet, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-03 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-25 17:59 [PATCH v2 00/16] drm/vkms: Add configfs support José Expósito
2025-02-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] drm/vkms: Expose device creation and destruction José Expósito
2025-02-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] drm/vkms: Add and remove VKMS instances via configfs José Expósito
2025-02-28 15:19 ` Louis Chauvet
2025-03-03 8:33 ` José Expósito
2025-02-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] drm/vkms: Allow to configure multiple planes " José Expósito
2025-02-28 14:43 ` Louis Chauvet
2025-03-03 8:50 ` José Expósito
2025-03-03 10:34 ` Louis Chauvet [this message]
2025-03-04 14:54 ` José Expósito
2025-03-04 15:35 ` Louis Chauvet
2025-03-04 16:23 ` José Expósito
2025-03-04 18:17 ` Louis Chauvet
2025-03-06 10:49 ` José Expósito
2025-02-28 14:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] configfs: Add mechanism to prevent item/group deletion Louis Chauvet
2025-02-28 14:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] configfs: Add mechanism to prevent symlink deletion Louis Chauvet
2025-02-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] drm/vkms: Allow to configure the plane type via configfs José Expósito
2025-02-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] drm/vkms: Allow to configure multiple CRTCs " José Expósito
2025-02-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] drm/vkms: Allow to configure CRTC writeback support " José Expósito
2025-02-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] drm/vkms: Allow to attach planes and CRTCs " José Expósito
2025-02-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] drm/vkms: Allow to configure multiple encoders " José Expósito
2025-02-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] drm/vkms: Allow to attach encoders and CRTCs " José Expósito
2025-02-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] drm/vkms: Allow to configure multiple connectors " José Expósito
2025-02-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] drm/vkms: Allow to attach connectors and encoders " José Expósito
2025-02-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] drm/vkms: Allow to configure the default device creation José Expósito
2025-02-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] drm/vkms: Remove completed task from the TODO list José Expósito
2025-02-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] drm/vkms: Allow to configure connector status José Expósito
2025-02-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] drm/vkms: Allow to update the " José Expósito
2025-02-25 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] drm/vkms: Allow to configure connector status via configfs José Expósito
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e813ac5b-298c-4863-b0b6-e9ac7fec1da0@bootlin.com \
--to=louis.chauvet@bootlin.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hamohammed.sa@gmail.com \
--cc=jose.exposito89@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=melissa.srw@gmail.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox