From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763088AbYDURg2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:36:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759954AbYDURgI (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:36:08 -0400 Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com ([216.239.58.187]:16518 "EHLO gv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757885AbYDURgG (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:36:06 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hRWlcg7OGSe3BrqmAWuwWar0QcwCZJjHrGieZC+5pOMU6JA5u2BkH0myV/P78t7WT7WKt0LtA3ECkIHOO1PC5IHy0rlU3O8SSM2Ob+KeoyNC9V0sRaBwcO0B8VyKE1hmexLd/U32DPmkPda4jJr5cP/VuhM0HQNzogLEv0flMeM= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:07:12 +0200 From: Matthew To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_B=E4chler?=" Subject: Fwd: Linux 2.6.25 (coretemp reads high temperatures) Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200804182151.49021.lenb@kernel.org> <480CBC92.4070502@archlinux.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (this is the last mail I sent, I apologize if it got there already correctly and only my browser displays it corrupted on lkml.org) thermal isn't working on this board (if you mean /proc/acpi/thermal_zone ...) I also tried a vanilla kernel & it showed the same higher temperature ;( here the last mail (on lkml it was corrupted) - I don't know if you were able to read it > sure, I'll test-drive the vanilla-kernel, too > > thanks ok, tested the vanilla-kernel this morning and it shows the exact high temperatures (with CONFIG_THERMAL=y) I've got a question: when trying to disable thermal it just sits there & won't change: <*> Hardware Monitoring support ---> -*- Generic Thermal sysfs driver ---> it seemingly depends on other things: Selected by: ACPI_THERMAL && !X86_VOYAGER && ACPI && ACPI_PROCESSOR is it safe to disable acpi_processor and acpi or CONFIG_THERMAL in general ? or will it burn down my box ? ;) I'm asking this because it says/writes: CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL: This driver adds support for ACPI thermal zones. Most mobile and some desktop systems support ACPI thermal zones. It is HIGHLY recommended that this option be enabled, as your processor(s) may be damaged without it. thanks Mat