The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Chudov <ichudov@gmail.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hyperthreading on 4 core CPU DECREASES performance???
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:00:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e86b7d350910281700x1383296i73cd1ee4694e9c8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091028222439.3e0be650@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>> This is Ubuntu Hardy, 2.6.24 kernel. I tried the same with 2.6.31,
>> with the same effect.

>> I would like to know how can I make the scheduler to prefer to spread
>> the tasks across physical cores as opposed to bundling two on one core
>> and leaving some cores idle.
>
> The scheduler will try and do balancing for packages and for HT. Make
> sure your distribution is built with the SCHED_SMT and SCHED_MC options
> enabled. Some of the non-enterprise distirbutions may well not have these
> enabled.

Yes, for the stock hardy -server and -generic kernel:

CONFIG_SCHED_MC=y
CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=y

>
> For hand laying out threads see: man pthread_setaffinity_np
>
> The win from HT depends a lot on the CPU and also the workload mix. In
> some workloads it will decrease performance.

OK, I think that I understand. Thanks.

So, what you are basically saying is that there is no option to
improve this behavior, right?

Thanks Alan.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-29  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-28 19:24 Hyperthreading on 4 core CPU DECREASES performance??? Igor Chudov
2009-10-28 20:46 ` Andreas Mohr
2009-10-28 21:11   ` Igor Chudov
2009-10-28 22:24 ` Alan Cox
2009-10-29  0:00   ` Igor Chudov [this message]
2009-10-29  0:44     ` Ben Gamari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e86b7d350910281700x1383296i73cd1ee4694e9c8@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ichudov@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox