From: "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>
To: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, alex@shazbot.org, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
fiuczy@linux.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/15] s390/vfio-ap: Callback to get/set vfio device mig state during guest migration
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:04:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e94dfa4a-e2b3-4cda-904a-ef571d2277db@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807221834.562851-6-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
On 8/7/26 6:18 PM, Anthony Krowiak wrote:
> Implements two callbacks related to the current state of a vfio-ap device:
> * The callback that sets a new migration state of a vfio-ap device during
> live migration of guests with pass-through access to AP devices. This
> callback is mandatory for VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_MIGRATION support.
>
> The function pointer for this callback is specified via the
> 'migration_set_state' field of the 'vfio_migration_ops' structure
> which is stored with the VFIO device when the 'vfio_device'
> structure representing the mediated device is initialized.
>
> * The callback that returns the current vfio device migration state during
> live migration of guests with pass-through access to AP devices.
>
> The function pointer for this callback is specified via the
> 'migration_get_state' field of the 'vfio_migration_ops' structure
> which is stored with the VFIO device when the 'vfio_device'
> structure representing the mediated device is initialized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_migration.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_migration.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_migration.c
> index 1613813124b6..af740b177c97 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_migration.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_migration.c
> @@ -128,16 +128,141 @@ static void vfio_ap_release_resuming_file(struct vfio_ap_migration_data *mig_dat
> */
> }
>
> +static struct file *
> +vfio_ap_transition_to_state(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
> + enum vfio_device_mig_state new_state)
> +{
> + struct vfio_ap_migration_data *mig_data;
> + enum vfio_device_mig_state cur_state;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
> + mig_data = matrix_mdev->mig_data;
> + cur_state = mig_data->mig_state;
> + dev_dbg(matrix_mdev->vdev.dev, "%s: %d -> %d\n", __func__, cur_state,
> + new_state);
> +
> + if (cur_state == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP &&
> + new_state == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP_COPY) {
> + /* TODO */
> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> + }
> +
> + if (cur_state == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP &&
> + new_state == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RESUMING) {
> + /* TODO */
> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> + }
> +
> + if ((cur_state == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RESUMING &&
> + new_state == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP) ||
> + (cur_state == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP_COPY &&
> + new_state == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP)) {
> + /* TODO */
> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> + }
> +
> + if ((cur_state == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP &&
> + new_state == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING) ||
> + (cur_state == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING &&
> + new_state == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP)) {
> + /* TODO */
> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> + }
> +
> + /* vfio_mig_get_next_state() does not use arcs other than the above */
> + WARN_ON(true);
> +
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +}
> +
> static struct file *vfio_ap_set_state(struct vfio_device *vdev,
> enum vfio_device_mig_state new_state)
> {
> - return NULL;
> + int ret;
> + struct file *filp = NULL;
> + struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev;
> + enum vfio_device_mig_state next_state;
> + struct vfio_ap_migration_data *mig_data;
> +
> + matrix_mdev = container_of(vdev, struct ap_matrix_mdev, vdev);
The container_of() pointer swizzle is done under lock in
vfio_ap_get_state, but not here. Why? They should probably be handled
consistently.
> +
> + mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
> + if (ap_is_se_guest()) {
> + dev_err_once(matrix_mdev->vdev.dev,
> + "Migration not allowed from or to a Secure Execution guest\n");
> + mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
> + return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
> + }
> +
> + mig_data = matrix_mdev->mig_data;
> +
> + /*
> + * The mig_data pointer is set in the vfio_ap_init_migration_data
> + * function which is called when the vfio-ap device fd is opened.
> + * Since the implicit pre-open state is RUNNING, a request to set
> + * RUNNING is a no-op. Any other state transition is invalid before
> + * open_device.
> + */
> + if (!mig_data) {
> + mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
> + if (new_state == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING)
> + return NULL;
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(vdev->dev, "%s -> %d\n", __func__, new_state);
> +
> + while (mig_data->mig_state != VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_ERROR &&
> + mig_data->mig_state != new_state) {
> + ret = vfio_mig_get_next_state(vdev, mig_data->mig_state,
> + new_state, &next_state);
> + if (ret) {
> + filp = ERR_PTR(ret);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + filp = vfio_ap_transition_to_state(matrix_mdev, next_state);
> + if (IS_ERR(filp))
> + break;
> +
> + mig_data->mig_state = next_state;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(filp && new_state != next_state)) {
> + fput(filp);
> + filp = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
> +
> + return filp;
> }
>
> static int vfio_ap_get_state(struct vfio_device *vdev,
> enum vfio_device_mig_state *current_state)
> {
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev;
> + struct vfio_ap_migration_data *mig_data;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
> +
> + matrix_mdev = container_of(vdev, struct ap_matrix_mdev, vdev);
> + mig_data = matrix_mdev->mig_data;
Why bother with temp variable? You could just access
matrix_mdev->mig_data directly.
> +
> + /*
> + * The mig_data pointer is set in the vfio_ap_init_migration_data
> + * function which is called when the vfio-ap device fd is opened.
> + * If mig_data is NULL, report RUNNING as the implicit pre-open state
> + * so userspace doesn't need to perform any state transition before the
> + * device becomes active.
> + */
> + *current_state = (mig_data) ? mig_data->mig_state :
> + VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING;
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int vfio_ap_get_data_size(struct vfio_device *vdev,
> @@ -159,6 +284,7 @@ static const struct vfio_migration_ops vfio_ap_migration_ops = {
> */
> void vfio_ap_init_migration_capabilities(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
> {
> + /* Live guest migration is not supported for SE guests */
> if (ap_is_se_guest())
> return;
>
Comment is unrelated to the rest of the patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-07 22:18 [PATCH v7 00/15] s390/vfio-ap: Add live guest migration support Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-07 22:18 ` [PATCH v7 01/15] s390/vfio-ap: Provide function to get the number of queues assigned to mdev Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-10 13:14 ` Jason J. Herne
2026-08-07 22:18 ` [PATCH v7 02/15] s390/vfio-ap: Data structures for facilitating vfio device migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-10 13:45 ` Jason J. Herne
2026-08-07 22:18 ` [PATCH v7 03/15] s390/vfio-ap: Functions to initialize/release vfio device migration data Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-11 13:57 ` Jason J. Herne
2026-08-07 22:18 ` [PATCH v7 04/15] s390/vfio-ap: Reset migration state in VFIO_DEVICE_RESET ioctl handler Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-11 17:05 ` Jason J. Herne
2026-08-07 22:18 ` [PATCH v7 05/15] s390/vfio-ap: Callback to get/set vfio device mig state during guest migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 16:04 ` Jason J. Herne [this message]
2026-08-07 22:18 ` [PATCH v7 06/15] s390/vfio-ap: Transition guest migration state from STOP to STOP_COPY Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-07 22:18 ` [PATCH v7 07/15] s390/vfio-ap: File ops called to save the vfio device migration state Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-07 22:18 ` [PATCH v7 08/15] s390/vfio-ap: Transition device migration state from STOP to RESUMING Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-07 22:18 ` [PATCH v7 09/15] s390/vfio-ap: Add method to set a new guest AP configuration Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-07 22:18 ` [PATCH v7 10/15] s390/vfio-ap: File ops called to resume the vfio device migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-07 22:18 ` [PATCH v7 11/15] s390/vfio-ap: Transition device migration state to STOP Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-07 22:18 ` [PATCH v7 12/15] s390/vfio-ap: Transition device migration state from STOP to RUNNING and vice versa Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-07 22:18 ` [PATCH v7 13/15] s390/vfio-ap: Callback to get the size of data to be migrated during guest migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-07 22:18 ` [PATCH v7 14/15] s390/vfio-ap: Add 'migratable' feature to sysfs 'features' attribute Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-07 22:18 ` [PATCH v7 15/15] s390/vfio-ap: Add live guest migration chapter to vfio-ap.rst Anthony Krowiak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e94dfa4a-e2b3-4cda-904a-ef571d2277db@linux.ibm.com \
--to=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=fiuczy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox