From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from layka.disroot.org (layka.disroot.org [178.21.23.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E126C20371F; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 19:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.21.23.139 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738697404; cv=none; b=CK8wjPZmXuAOzDThGZi1p0sSC8vqczCQAo0bV3s/xiABnT/bAR2ABxzvZJlIQj27Qt9JebeMSb+La5JfL2flJL73vvNI7OcuyMYhGXdmM0rVkHtiCHU+HtDpq2Adi/ABIL19c1HeRfuYRLfzkYAjI666MQ3GKzrBOZuVDWfWVf4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738697404; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hxElP6ZMp8TmfVNOG45r9dWrj5+/1qB6QlQBTJTNWfU=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=vB7tk7KM6Ai/IqGwz4J8E/HcHHLx1ePaupWiw0I/EIL3tyGHFS6U0c584fS8ki5V2fcURK6SsxdOu8BMLhFsIdDV768EvDRVZ9zTfTkqhCPCqesLxWgNGghRcB9ILsry4fUCSZpO4R6GmnrCPn/FSpTp2Iz9bjYxJocHwtBeDL0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=disroot.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=disroot.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=disroot.org header.i=@disroot.org header.b=HphrJAQj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.21.23.139 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=disroot.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=disroot.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=disroot.org header.i=@disroot.org header.b="HphrJAQj" Received: from mail01.disroot.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB34625B35; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 20:30:00 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id sI-zIj3P_Tsb; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 20:29:59 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1738697399; bh=hxElP6ZMp8TmfVNOG45r9dWrj5+/1qB6QlQBTJTNWfU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=HphrJAQj4f+5MpePcznZQt9+nPvLQp/jJrxZlgaE+vWtgagKBmJ++NGCWO3C8jTcx 84mxKI0yCgq9o/EOybq1ZhM865i7LUE0BGY36QwCgHFZarxOLxpJTmmLeLYC+BZyRo LHg7GjVahaP6wKMt9NeaXRGQ14P5f5zZ1Sw+ltVn3KssBDM8RZeD6n5CD6UlUvGA7Z pJnIuhANa1G+TrG4Am1dACp4iRUtpAnOTMPm1yoLFUdkkze4TkpbjahyUSt615LVKV DrnP821pFvCLCGmugmmjIjPz7l4qWCW/juXKFP/VEkJ3xP6tiLCrZrmDrVrfOD7b0h BIRdx3taTP9nw== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2025 19:29:59 +0000 From: Kaustabh Chakraborty To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Rob Herring , Conor Dooley , Alim Akhtar , Sergey Lisov , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kaustabh Chakraborty Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add chip ID for Exynos7870 SoC In-Reply-To: <339ea40f-6bc7-42ad-a5c2-f57b3be8cc39@kernel.org> References: <20250204-exynos7870-chipid-v1-0-0bf2db08e621@disroot.org> <339ea40f-6bc7-42ad-a5c2-f57b3be8cc39@kernel.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: kauschluss@disroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2025-02-04 07:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 03/02/2025 21:32, Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote: >> This patch series is a part of Exynos7870 upstreaming. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kaustabh Chakraborty >> --- >> Kaustabh Chakraborty (2): >> dt-bindings: hwinfo: samsung,exynos-chipid: add exynos7870-chipid compatible >> soc: samsung: exynos-chipid: add support for exynos7870 >> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwinfo/samsung,exynos-chipid.yaml | 1 + >> drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c | 1 + >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) > > When I asked to split, I said per subsystem. Soc is one subsystem. > Everything targeting SoC should be in one patchset. get_maintainers.pl > tells the name of the subsystem and its maintainers. > > If there is going to be resend/new version, combine patchsets for soc > into one patchset (just like the example I gave last time). Alright, so I'll move these patches to the one which has the devicetrees. There's also a Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ patch in exynos7870-pmu-clocks [1]. The CLKOUT driver uses the compatible declared in there, i.e., the CLKOUT driver depends on that commit. So, should it stay there? Or...? [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250204-exynos7870-pmu-clocks-v1-0-a3030ae5bb53@disroot.org > > Best regards, > Krzysztof