From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
To: Sagi Maimon <maimon.sagi@gmail.com>,
jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ptp: ocp: fix start time alignment in ptp_ocp_signal_set
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:36:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea1c5102-a327-489f-a29a-769e6f542701@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250414143220.121657-1-maimon.sagi@gmail.com>
On 14/04/2025 15:32, Sagi Maimon wrote:
> In ptp_ocp_signal_set, the start time for periodic signals is not
> aligned to the next period boundary. The current code rounds up the
> start time and divides by the period but fails to multiply back by
> the period, causing misaligned signal starts. Fix this by multiplying
> the rounded-up value by the period to ensure the start time is the
> closest next period.
>
> Fixes: 4bd46bb037f8e ("ptp: ocp: Use DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP for rounding.")
> Signed-off-by: Sagi Maimon <maimon.sagi@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
> index 7945c6be1f7c..e5b55b78a6d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
> @@ -2067,6 +2067,7 @@ ptp_ocp_signal_set(struct ptp_ocp *bp, int gen, struct ptp_ocp_signal *s)
> if (!s->start) {
> /* roundup() does not work on 32-bit systems */
> s->start = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(start_ns, s->period);
> + s->start = (s->start) * (s->period);
No parenthesis are needed here. it's better to put this line as
s->start *= s->period;
> s->start = ktime_add(s->start, s->phase);
> }
>
pw-bot:cr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-14 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-14 14:32 [PATCH v1] ptp: ocp: fix start time alignment in ptp_ocp_signal_set Sagi Maimon
2025-04-14 16:36 ` Vadim Fedorenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea1c5102-a327-489f-a29a-769e6f542701@linux.dev \
--to=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maimon.sagi@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox