From: "Simmons, James A." <simmonsja@ornl.gov>
To: "'Greg Kroah-Hartman'" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Cc: "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: RE: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 00/10] Last batch of fixes for LNet
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:34:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb04d2ccb6ef4fe98df59ecb9f75afa9@EXCHCS32.ornl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160305195256.GA8126@kroah.com>
>On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:09:40PM -0500, James Simmons wrote:
>> This batch merges the remaining LNet patches from the OpenSFS
>> branch for the upstream client. Once merged the LNet code
>> will be up to date with the latest production code. Only style
>> issues are remaining. Still future patches being developed
>> for LNet will be landed to the upstream client as soon as they
>> are ready after extensive testing.
>
>Please fix up the build issue, and figure out what went wrong with the
>__user patch that you sent and resend this series after reworking them.
I had a discussion with Oleg about the __user patch. It appears that is
a bug in the production branch so that patch can be dropped. As for the
build issues this has been a know issue for a awhile but nobody has
gotten around to fixing all the 32 bit issues. I guess it is time to fix that up.
I will send out new patches later after I'm doing testing them.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-07 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-05 2:09 [PATCH 00/10] Last batch of fixes for LNet James Simmons
2016-03-05 2:09 ` [PATCH 01/10] staging: lustre: LNet drop rule implementation James Simmons
2016-03-05 7:53 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-05 2:09 ` [PATCH 02/10] staging: lustre: LNet network latency simulation James Simmons
2016-03-05 2:09 ` [PATCH 03/10] staging: lustre: fix 'data race condition' issue in conrpc.c James Simmons
2016-03-05 2:09 ` [PATCH 04/10] staging: lustre: fix 'NULL pointer dereference' errors James Simmons
2016-03-05 2:09 ` [PATCH 05/10] staging: lustre: fix 'data race condition' issue in framework.c James Simmons
2016-03-05 2:09 ` [PATCH 06/10] staging: lustre: Correct missing newline James Simmons
2016-03-05 2:09 ` [PATCH 07/10] staging: lustre: add last missing sparse annotation __user James Simmons
2016-03-05 2:55 ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-05 2:09 ` [PATCH 08/10] staging: lustre: change test to asser in LNetGetId James Simmons
2016-03-05 2:09 ` [PATCH 09/10] staging: lustre: rename proc_call_handler to lprocfs_call_handler James Simmons
2016-03-05 2:09 ` [PATCH 10/10] staging: lustre: make LNet use lprocfs_call_handler James Simmons
2016-03-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 00/10] Last batch of fixes for LNet Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-03-07 19:34 ` Simmons, James A. [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eb04d2ccb6ef4fe98df59ecb9f75afa9@EXCHCS32.ornl.gov \
--to=simmonsja@ornl.gov \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox