From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
"Mukunda,Vijendar" <vijendar.mukunda@amd.com>,
broonie@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: Mastan.Katragadda@amd.com, Sunil-kumar.Dommati@amd.com,
Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@amd.com, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Syed Saba Kareem <Syed.SabaKareem@amd.com>,
arungopal.kondaveeti@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/19] ASoC: amd: ps: increase runtime suspend delay
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 10:05:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb12ed5d-a9f9-cb8d-28f5-ac84c75cf441@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1a14e117-4216-b98d-f972-c9a02cf79d1e@amd.com>
On 1/12/23 09:29, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
> On 1/12/2023 08:54, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/12/23 05:02, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
>>> On 11/01/23 21:32, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>>> On 1/11/23 03:02, Vijendar Mukunda wrote:
>>>>> To avoid ACP entering into D3 state during slave enumeration and
>>>>> initialization on two soundwire controller instances for multiple
>>>>> codecs,
>>>>> increase the runtime suspend delay to 3 seconds.
>>>> You have a parent PCI device and a set of child devices for each
>>>> manager. The parent PCI device cannot suspend before all its children
>>>> are also suspended, so shouldn't the delay be modified at the
>>>> manager level?
>>>>
>>>> Not getting what this delay is and how this would deal with a lengthy
>>>> enumeration/initialization process.
>>> Yes agreed. Until Child devices are suspended, parent device will
>>> be in D0 state. We will rephrase the commit message.
>>>
>>> Machine driver node will be created by ACP PCI driver.
>>> We have added delay in machine driver to make sure
>>> two manager instances completes codec enumeration and
>>> peripheral initialization before registering the sound card.
>>> Without adding delay in machine driver will result early card
>>> registration before codec initialization is completed. Manager
>>> will enter in to bad state due to codec read/write failures.
>>> We are intended to keep the ACP in D0 state, till sound card
>>> is created and jack controls are initialized. To handle, at manager
>>> level increased runtime suspend delay.
>>
>> This doesn't look too good. You should not assume any timing
>> dependencies in the machine driver probe. I made that mistake in earlier
>> versions and we had to revisit all this to make sure drivers could be
>> bound/unbound at any time.
>
> Rather than a timing dependency, could you perhaps prohibit runtime PM
> and have a codec make a callback to indicate it's fully initialized and
> then allow runtime PM again?
We already have enumeration and initialization 'struct completion' that
are used by codec drivers to know if the hardware is usable. We also
have pm_runtime_get_sync() is the bus layer to make sure the codec is
resumed before being accessed.
The explanations above confuse card registration and manager
probe/initialization. These are two different things. Maybe there's
indeed a missing part in the SoundWire PM assumptions, but I am not
getting what the issue is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-12 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230111090222.2016499-1-Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 01/19] ASoC: amd: ps: create platform devices based on acp config Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-11 13:27 ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-01-11 14:13 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-11 13:32 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-13 12:36 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-13 17:11 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-16 8:02 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-31 13:09 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-31 13:24 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-01-31 16:00 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-31 22:57 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-02-01 0:51 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-02-01 1:45 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-02-01 2:03 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-02-01 2:10 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-02-01 3:52 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-02-01 6:01 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-02-01 23:08 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-02-06 6:30 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-02-06 14:50 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-02-06 16:38 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 02/19] soundwire: amd: Add support for AMD Master driver Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-11 13:59 ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-01-11 14:16 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-11 14:37 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-13 18:21 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-13 18:41 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-16 7:53 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-16 14:57 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-17 11:37 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 03/19] soundwire: amd: register sdw controller dai ops Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-11 14:58 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-13 11:31 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-13 17:13 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-11 14:59 ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 04/19] soundwire: amd: enable build for AMD soundwire master driver Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-19 18:35 ` kernel test robot
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 05/19] soundwire: amd: add soundwire interrupt handling Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-11 15:19 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-19 22:00 ` kernel test robot
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 06/19] ASoC: amd: ps: add support for soundwire interrupts in acp pci driver Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 07/19] ASoC: amd: ps: add soundwire dma driver for pink sardine platform Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-11 15:22 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-12 9:10 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 08/19] ASoC: amd: ps: add soundwire dma driver dma ops Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-11 13:04 ` Mark Brown
2023-01-11 14:08 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-11 15:34 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-13 11:16 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-13 17:05 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-16 6:59 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 09/19] ASoC: amd: ps: add support for Soundwire DMA interrupts Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-11 15:38 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-12 10:55 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 10/19] ASoC: amd: ps: enable Soundwire DMA driver build Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 11/19] ASoC: amd: update comments in Kconfig file Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 12/19] ASoC: amd: ps: Add soundwire specific checks in pci driver in pm ops Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 13/19] ASoC: amd: ps: add support for runtime pm ops for soundwire dma driver Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 14/19] soundwire: amd: add runtime pm ops for AMD master driver Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-11 15:47 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-12 10:35 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-12 14:47 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 15/19] soundwire: amd: add startup and shutdown dai ops Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-11 15:49 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-12 10:22 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 16/19] soundwire: amd: handle wake enable interrupt Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-11 15:54 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-12 10:21 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 17/19] soundwire: amd: add pm_prepare callback and pm ops support Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-11 15:58 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-12 10:14 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-12 14:50 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 18/19] ASoC: amd: ps: implement system level pm ops for soundwire dma driver Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-11 9:02 ` [PATCH 19/19] ASoC: amd: ps: increase runtime suspend delay Vijendar Mukunda
2023-01-11 16:02 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-12 11:02 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-12 14:54 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-12 15:29 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-01-12 16:05 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2023-01-13 10:58 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-13 17:33 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-13 19:57 ` Mark Brown
2023-01-16 8:35 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-16 15:02 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-17 11:33 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-01-17 11:51 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-01-17 12:16 ` Mark Brown
2023-01-17 12:36 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eb12ed5d-a9f9-cb8d-28f5-ac84c75cf441@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@amd.com \
--cc=Mastan.Katragadda@amd.com \
--cc=Sunil-kumar.Dommati@amd.com \
--cc=Syed.SabaKareem@amd.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=arungopal.kondaveeti@amd.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=vijendar.mukunda@amd.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).