public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@google.com, chao.gao@intel.com, zhao1.liu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 14/20] KVM: x86: Emulate REX2-prefixed 64-bit absolute jump
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 17:39:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb61475f-e5be-4f39-ac62-908453895ad9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251110180131.28264-15-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>

On 11/10/25 19:01, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> Add support for the new absolute jump, previously unimplemented.
> 
> This instruction has an unusual quirk: the REX2.W bit uses inverted
> polarity. Unlike normal REX or REX2 semantics (where W=1 indicates a
> 64-bit operand size), this instruction uses W=0 to select an 8-byte
> operand size.
> 
> The new InvertedWidthPolarity flag and its helper to interpret the
> W bit correctly, avoiding special-case hacks in the emulator logic.
> 
> Since the ctxt->op_bytes depends on the instruction flags, the size
> should be determined after the instruction lookup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>

I think this is not needed.  Emulation of non-memory operations, in 
practice, is only needed to support big real mode on very old processors.

We can just add a NoRex bit and apply it to the six reows you touch in 
patch 13.

Paolo

> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index 58879a31abcd..03f8e007b14e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@
>   #define TwoMemOp    ((u64)1 << 55)  /* Instruction has two memory operand */
>   #define IsBranch    ((u64)1 << 56)  /* Instruction is considered a branch. */
>   #define ShadowStack ((u64)1 << 57)  /* Instruction affects Shadow Stacks. */
> +#define InvertedWidthPolarity ((u64)1 << 58) /* Instruction uses inverted REX2.W polarity */
>   
>   #define DstXacc     (DstAccLo | SrcAccHi | SrcWrite)
>   
> @@ -993,6 +994,16 @@ EM_ASM_2W(btc);
>   
>   EM_ASM_2R(cmp, cmp_r);
>   
> +static inline bool is_64bit_operand_size(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Most instructions interpret REX.W=1 as 64-bit operand size.
> +	 * Some REX2 opcodes invert this logic.
> +	 */
> +	return ctxt->d & InvertedWidthPolarity ?
> +	       ctxt->rex.bits.w == 0 : ctxt->rex.bits.w == 1;
> +}
> +
>   static int em_bsf_c(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>   {
>   	/* If src is zero, do not writeback, but update flags */
> @@ -2472,7 +2483,7 @@ static int em_sysexit(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>   
>   	setup_syscalls_segments(&cs, &ss);
>   
> -	if (ctxt->rex.bits.w)
> +	if (is_64bit_operand_size(ctxt))
>   		usermode = X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64;
>   	else
>   		usermode = X86EMUL_MODE_PROT32;
> @@ -4486,7 +4497,8 @@ static struct opcode rex2_opcode_table[256]  __ro_after_init;
>   static struct opcode rex2_twobyte_table[256] __ro_after_init;
>   
>   static const struct opcode undefined = D(Undefined);
> -static const struct opcode notimpl   = N;
> +static const struct opcode pfx_d5_a1 = I(SrcImm64 | NearBranch | IsBranch | InvertedWidthPolarity, \
> +					 em_jmp_abs);
>   
>   #undef D
>   #undef N
> @@ -4543,6 +4555,7 @@ static bool is_ibt_instruction(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>   		return true;
>   	case SrcNone:
>   	case SrcImm:
> +	case SrcImm64:
>   	case SrcImmByte:
>   	/*
>   	 * Note, ImmU16 is used only for the stack adjustment operand on ENTER
> @@ -4895,9 +4908,6 @@ int x86_decode_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *insn, int insn_len, int
>   
>   done_prefixes:
>   
> -	if (ctxt->rex.bits.w)
> -		ctxt->op_bytes = 8;
> -
>   	/* Determine opcode byte(s): */
>   	if (ctxt->rex_prefix == REX2_INVALID) {
>   		/*
> @@ -4936,6 +4946,9 @@ int x86_decode_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *insn, int insn_len, int
>   	}
>   	ctxt->d = opcode.flags;
>   
> +	if (is_64bit_operand_size(ctxt))
> +		ctxt->op_bytes = 8;
> +
>   	if (ctxt->d & ModRM)
>   		ctxt->modrm = insn_fetch(u8, ctxt);
>   
> @@ -5594,6 +5607,6 @@ void __init kvm_init_rex2_opcode_table(void)
>   	undefine_row(&rex2_twobyte_table[0x30]);
>   	undefine_row(&rex2_twobyte_table[0x80]);
>   
> -	/* Mark opcode not yet implemented: */
> -	rex2_opcode_table[0xa1] = notimpl;
> +	/* Define the REX2-specific absolute jump (0xA1) opcode */
> +	rex2_opcode_table[0xa1] = pfx_d5_a1;
>   }


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-11 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-10 18:01 [PATCH RFC v1 00/20] KVM: x86: Support APX feature for guests Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 01/20] KVM: x86: Rename register accessors to be GPR-specific Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 02/20] KVM: x86: Refactor GPR accessors to differentiate register access types Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 18:08   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:19     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 18:11   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:18     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 03/20] KVM: x86: Implement accessors for extended GPRs Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 04/20] KVM: VMX: Introduce unified instruction info structure Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 05/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor instruction information retrieval Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 06/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor GPR index retrieval from exit qualification Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 07/20] KVM: nVMX: Support the extended instruction info field Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 17:48   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-12  1:54     ` Chao Gao
2025-11-13 23:21       ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-17 23:29       ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-18  1:39         ` Chao Gao
2025-11-18 10:33           ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:20     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 08/20] KVM: VMX: Support extended register index in exit handling Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 17:45   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:22     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-13 23:40       ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 09/20] KVM: x86: Support EGPR accessing and tracking for instruction emulation Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 10/20] KVM: x86: Refactor REX prefix handling in " Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 18:17   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:23     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 11/20] KVM: x86: Refactor opcode table lookup " Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 16:55   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:24     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 12/20] KVM: x86: Support REX2-extended register index in the decoder Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 16:53   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:26     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 16:53   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 13/20] KVM: x86: Add REX2 opcode tables to the instruction decoder Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 14/20] KVM: x86: Emulate REX2-prefixed 64-bit absolute jump Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 16:39   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2025-11-13 23:27     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 15/20] KVM: x86: Reject EVEX-prefix instructions in the emulator Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 16:37   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:28     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 16/20] KVM: x86: Decode REX2 prefix " Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 17:55   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:30     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-13 23:34       ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-17 20:01       ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-17 23:33         ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 17/20] KVM: x86: Prepare APX state setting in XCR0 Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 16:59   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:32     ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 18/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX foundational feature bit to guests Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 19/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX sub-features " Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 20/20] KVM: selftests: Add APX state handling and XCR0 sanity checks Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:50 ` [PATCH RFC v1 00/20] KVM: x86: Support APX feature for guests Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 18:14 ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eb61475f-e5be-4f39-ac62-908453895ad9@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox