* [PATCH v3] fuse: fix premature writetrhough request for large folio
@ 2026-01-15 2:36 Jingbo Xu
2026-02-24 8:22 ` Jingbo Xu
2026-02-27 15:23 ` Miklos Szeredi
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jingbo Xu @ 2026-01-15 2:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: miklos, linux-fsdevel, joannelkoong; +Cc: linux-kernel, horst, joseph.qi
When large folio is enabled and the initial folio offset exceeds
PAGE_SIZE, e.g. the position resides in the second page of a large
folio, after the folio copying the offset (in the page) won't be updated
to 0 even though the expected range is successfully copied until the end
of the folio. In this case fuse_fill_write_pages() exits prematurelly
before the request has reached the max_write/max_pages limit.
Fix this by eliminating page offset entirely and use folio offset
instead.
Fixes: d60a6015e1a2 ("fuse: support large folios for writethrough writes")
Reviewed-by: Horst Birthelmer <hbirthelmer@ddn.com>
Reviewed-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
---
changes since v2:
- drop stable CC tag; add Reviewed-by tag by Joanne
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260114055615.17903-1-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260114124514.62998-1-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com/
---
fs/fuse/file.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
index 625d236b881b..6aafb32338b6 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -1272,7 +1272,6 @@ static ssize_t fuse_fill_write_pages(struct fuse_io_args *ia,
{
struct fuse_args_pages *ap = &ia->ap;
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(mapping->host);
- unsigned offset = pos & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
size_t count = 0;
unsigned int num;
int err = 0;
@@ -1299,7 +1298,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_fill_write_pages(struct fuse_io_args *ia,
if (mapping_writably_mapped(mapping))
flush_dcache_folio(folio);
- folio_offset = ((index - folio->index) << PAGE_SHIFT) + offset;
+ folio_offset = offset_in_folio(folio, pos);
bytes = min(folio_size(folio) - folio_offset, num);
tmp = copy_folio_from_iter_atomic(folio, folio_offset, bytes, ii);
@@ -1329,9 +1328,6 @@ static ssize_t fuse_fill_write_pages(struct fuse_io_args *ia,
count += tmp;
pos += tmp;
num -= tmp;
- offset += tmp;
- if (offset == folio_size(folio))
- offset = 0;
/* If we copied full folio, mark it uptodate */
if (tmp == folio_size(folio))
@@ -1343,7 +1339,9 @@ static ssize_t fuse_fill_write_pages(struct fuse_io_args *ia,
ia->write.folio_locked = true;
break;
}
- if (!fc->big_writes || offset != 0)
+ if (!fc->big_writes)
+ break;
+ if (folio_offset + tmp != folio_size(folio))
break;
}
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] fuse: fix premature writetrhough request for large folio
2026-01-15 2:36 [PATCH v3] fuse: fix premature writetrhough request for large folio Jingbo Xu
@ 2026-02-24 8:22 ` Jingbo Xu
2026-02-27 15:23 ` Miklos Szeredi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jingbo Xu @ 2026-02-24 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: miklos, linux-fsdevel; +Cc: linux-kernel, horst, joseph.qi, Joanne Koong
On 1/15/26 10:36 AM, Jingbo Xu wrote:
> When large folio is enabled and the initial folio offset exceeds
> PAGE_SIZE, e.g. the position resides in the second page of a large
> folio, after the folio copying the offset (in the page) won't be updated
> to 0 even though the expected range is successfully copied until the end
> of the folio. In this case fuse_fill_write_pages() exits prematurelly
> before the request has reached the max_write/max_pages limit.
>
> Fix this by eliminating page offset entirely and use folio offset
> instead.
>
> Fixes: d60a6015e1a2 ("fuse: support large folios for writethrough writes")
> Reviewed-by: Horst Birthelmer <hbirthelmer@ddn.com>
> Reviewed-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> changes since v2:
> - drop stable CC tag; add Reviewed-by tag by Joanne
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260114055615.17903-1-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com/
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260114124514.62998-1-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com/
gentle ping...
> ---
> fs/fuse/file.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
> index 625d236b881b..6aafb32338b6 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
> @@ -1272,7 +1272,6 @@ static ssize_t fuse_fill_write_pages(struct fuse_io_args *ia,
> {
> struct fuse_args_pages *ap = &ia->ap;
> struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(mapping->host);
> - unsigned offset = pos & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> size_t count = 0;
> unsigned int num;
> int err = 0;
> @@ -1299,7 +1298,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_fill_write_pages(struct fuse_io_args *ia,
> if (mapping_writably_mapped(mapping))
> flush_dcache_folio(folio);
>
> - folio_offset = ((index - folio->index) << PAGE_SHIFT) + offset;
> + folio_offset = offset_in_folio(folio, pos);
> bytes = min(folio_size(folio) - folio_offset, num);
>
> tmp = copy_folio_from_iter_atomic(folio, folio_offset, bytes, ii);
> @@ -1329,9 +1328,6 @@ static ssize_t fuse_fill_write_pages(struct fuse_io_args *ia,
> count += tmp;
> pos += tmp;
> num -= tmp;
> - offset += tmp;
> - if (offset == folio_size(folio))
> - offset = 0;
>
> /* If we copied full folio, mark it uptodate */
> if (tmp == folio_size(folio))
> @@ -1343,7 +1339,9 @@ static ssize_t fuse_fill_write_pages(struct fuse_io_args *ia,
> ia->write.folio_locked = true;
> break;
> }
> - if (!fc->big_writes || offset != 0)
> + if (!fc->big_writes)
> + break;
> + if (folio_offset + tmp != folio_size(folio))
> break;
> }
>
--
Thanks,
Jingbo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] fuse: fix premature writetrhough request for large folio
2026-01-15 2:36 [PATCH v3] fuse: fix premature writetrhough request for large folio Jingbo Xu
2026-02-24 8:22 ` Jingbo Xu
@ 2026-02-27 15:23 ` Miklos Szeredi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Miklos Szeredi @ 2026-02-27 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jingbo Xu; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, joannelkoong, linux-kernel, horst, joseph.qi
On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 at 03:36, Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> When large folio is enabled and the initial folio offset exceeds
> PAGE_SIZE, e.g. the position resides in the second page of a large
> folio, after the folio copying the offset (in the page) won't be updated
> to 0 even though the expected range is successfully copied until the end
> of the folio. In this case fuse_fill_write_pages() exits prematurelly
> before the request has reached the max_write/max_pages limit.
>
> Fix this by eliminating page offset entirely and use folio offset
> instead.
>
> Fixes: d60a6015e1a2 ("fuse: support large folios for writethrough writes")
> Reviewed-by: Horst Birthelmer <hbirthelmer@ddn.com>
> Reviewed-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Applied, thanks.
Miklos
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-02-27 15:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-01-15 2:36 [PATCH v3] fuse: fix premature writetrhough request for large folio Jingbo Xu
2026-02-24 8:22 ` Jingbo Xu
2026-02-27 15:23 ` Miklos Szeredi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox