From: Wu Bo <wubo.oduw@gmail.com>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>, Wu Bo <bo.wu@vivo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: armada8k: change to use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 08:06:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ebff7e4c-a561-4c61-a40d-f1905ac3d42a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANAwSgQpu9NYugu_=PCVQGXiXCptxLT2Q1xQ5KqbwvkU0kfWDQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2024/8/27 14:44, Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi Wu Bo,
>
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 at 07:55, Wu Bo <bo.wu@vivo.com> wrote:
>> Use devm_clk_get_enabled() instead of devm_clk_get() to make the code
>> cleaner and avoid calling clk_disable_unprepare()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wu Bo <bo.wu@vivo.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-armada8k.c | 36 ++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-armada8k.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-armada8k.c
>> index b5c599ccaacf..e7ef6c2641b8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-armada8k.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-armada8k.c
>> @@ -284,23 +284,17 @@ static int armada8k_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> pcie->pci = pci;
>>
>> - pcie->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
>> + pcie->clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, NULL);
>> if (IS_ERR(pcie->clk))
>> - return PTR_ERR(pcie->clk);
>> -
>> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(pcie->clk);
>> - if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> -
>> - pcie->clk_reg = devm_clk_get(dev, "reg");
>> - if (pcie->clk_reg == ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER)) {
>> - ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> - goto fail;
>> - }
I don't know much about this device. But from the code here, its
previous logic is that the function will only return when the error code
is EPROBE_DEFER, and other errors will continue to execute.
So I followed the previous logic, is it correct?
>> - if (!IS_ERR(pcie->clk_reg)) {
>> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(pcie->clk_reg);
>> - if (ret)
>> - goto fail_clkreg;
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pcie->clk),
>> + "could not enable clk\n");
>> +
>> + pcie->clk_reg = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "reg");
>> + if (IS_ERR(pcie->clk_reg)) {
>> + ret = dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pcie->clk_reg),
>> + "could not enable reg clk\n");
>> + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> + goto out;
> You can drop this check as dev_err_probe handle this inside
> It will defer the enabling of clock.
>> }
>>
>> /* Get the dw-pcie unit configuration/control registers base. */
>> @@ -308,12 +302,12 @@ static int armada8k_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, base);
>> if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base)) {
>> ret = PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base);
>> - goto fail_clkreg;
>> + goto out;
>> }
>>
>> ret = armada8k_pcie_setup_phys(pcie);
>> if (ret)
>> - goto fail_clkreg;
>> + goto out;
>>
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
>>
>> @@ -325,11 +319,7 @@ static int armada8k_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> disable_phy:
>> armada8k_pcie_disable_phys(pcie);
>> -fail_clkreg:
>> - clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk_reg);
>> -fail:
>> - clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);
>> -
>> +out:
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
> Thanks
> -Anand
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-31 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-27 2:39 [PATCH v3] PCI: armada8k: change to use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper Wu Bo
2024-08-27 6:44 ` Anand Moon
2024-08-31 0:06 ` Wu Bo [this message]
2024-08-31 3:37 ` Anand Moon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ebff7e4c-a561-4c61-a40d-f1905ac3d42a@gmail.com \
--to=wubo.oduw@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bo.wu@vivo.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox