From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262598AbVGHEhS (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2005 00:37:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262603AbVGHEhS (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2005 00:37:18 -0400 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.201]:25425 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262598AbVGHEhQ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2005 00:37:16 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gybXzRArGhffdrTk9I0+RKimjS1ZtoMAV466fcDC6uRTK4wdiqx1H+odYtg+CCx8+ejeIAbXfziqkeUOCNrIshYBrJP6KVD9kBZJj+AKdUEZYIc5LAiE4B7CKMS00vbiSXOiPAAHZSr9bmEWkl5YN2do8Lo079VbRNoxIWy/sB0= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 21:37:15 -0700 From: david mosberger Reply-To: David.Mosberger@acm.org To: Hidetoshi Seto Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc1 07/10] IOCHK interface for I/O error handling/detecting Cc: Linux Kernel list , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, "Luck, Tony" , Linas Vepstas , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , long , linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linuxppc64-dev In-Reply-To: <42CB6961.2060508@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <42CB63B2.6000505@jp.fujitsu.com> <42CB6961.2060508@jp.fujitsu.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/5/05, Hidetoshi Seto wrote: > - could anyone write same barrier for intel compiler? > Tony or David, could you help me? I think it might be best to make ia64_mca_barrier() a proper subroutine written in assembly code. Yes, that costs some time, but we're talking about wasting 1,000+ cycles just to consume the value read via readX(), so the call-overhead is actually overlapped and completely trivial. --david