From: Eric Auger <eauger@redhat.com>
To: Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: arm64: maintain per VM value for CTR_EL0
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 12:37:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <edbe3039-ed42-432e-8309-5a0a46cc2d5c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240514072252.5657-3-sebott@redhat.com>
Hi Sebastian,
On 5/14/24 09:22, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> In preparation for CTR_EL0 emulation maintain a per VM for this
s/a per VM for this register/a per VM shadow register for this latter?
> register and use it where appropriate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 212ae77eefaf..1259be5e2f3e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -331,6 +331,8 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> #define KVM_ARM_ID_REG_NUM (IDREG_IDX(sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 7, 7)) + 1)
> u64 id_regs[KVM_ARM_ID_REG_NUM];
>
> + u64 ctr_el0;
> +
> /* Masks for VNCR-baked sysregs */
> struct kvm_sysreg_masks *sysreg_masks;
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 41741bf4d2b2..0213c96f73f2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -219,9 +219,9 @@ void vcpu_write_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val, int reg)
> * Returns the minimum line size for the selected cache, expressed as
> * Log2(bytes).
> */
> -static u8 get_min_cache_line_size(bool icache)
> +static u8 get_min_cache_line_size(struct kvm *kvm, bool icache)
> {
> - u64 ctr = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_CTR_EL0);
> + u64 ctr = kvm->arch.ctr_el0;
> u8 field;
>
> if (icache)
> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static u32 get_ccsidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 csselr)
> if (vcpu->arch.ccsidr)
> return vcpu->arch.ccsidr[csselr];
>
> - line_size = get_min_cache_line_size(csselr & CSSELR_EL1_InD);
> + line_size = get_min_cache_line_size(vcpu->kvm, csselr & CSSELR_EL1_InD);
>
> /*
> * Fabricate a CCSIDR value as the overriding value does not exist.
> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static int set_ccsidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 csselr, u32 val)
> u32 i;
>
> if ((val & CCSIDR_EL1_RES0) ||
> - line_size < get_min_cache_line_size(csselr & CSSELR_EL1_InD))
> + line_size < get_min_cache_line_size(vcpu->kvm, csselr & CSSELR_EL1_InD))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (!ccsidr) {
> @@ -1886,7 +1886,7 @@ static bool access_ctr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> if (p->is_write)
> return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
>
> - p->regval = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_CTR_EL0);
> + p->regval = vcpu->kvm->arch.ctr_el0;
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -1906,7 +1906,7 @@ static bool access_clidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> */
> static u64 reset_clidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> {
> - u64 ctr_el0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_CTR_EL0);
> + u64 ctr_el0 = vcpu->kvm->arch.ctr_el0;
> u64 clidr;
> u8 loc;
>
> @@ -1959,8 +1959,8 @@ static u64 reset_clidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> static int set_clidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> u64 val)
> {
> - u64 ctr_el0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_CTR_EL0);
> u64 idc = !CLIDR_LOC(val) || (!CLIDR_LOUIS(val) && !CLIDR_LOUU(val));
> + u64 ctr_el0 = vcpu->kvm->arch.ctr_el0;
>
> if ((val & CLIDR_EL1_RES0) || (!(ctr_el0 & CTR_EL0_IDC) && idc))
> return -EINVAL;
nit: you may update the function doc comment which the extra handling of
CTR_EL0.
> @@ -3557,6 +3557,13 @@ void kvm_reset_sys_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
> unsigned long i;
>
> + if (!kvm_vcpu_initialized(vcpu))
at this stage of the reading, why is the above check needed?
> + /*
> + * Make sure CTR_EL0 is initialized before registers
> + * that depend on it are reset.
> + */
nit: the above comment explains why you need to set the shadow ctr_el0
reg before resetting other id_regs and is not associated to the case
where (!kvm_vcpu_initialized(vcpu)) is true - at least that's my
understanding -. So I would put the comment before the check and while
at it also explain why the check is needed.
> + kvm->arch.ctr_el0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_CTR_EL0);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sys_reg_descs); i++) {
> const struct sys_reg_desc *r = &sys_reg_descs[i];
>
Thanks
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-29 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-14 7:22 [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: arm64: emulation for CTR_EL0 Sebastian Ott
2024-05-14 7:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: arm64: unify code to prepare traps Sebastian Ott
2024-05-27 8:01 ` Shaoqin Huang
2024-05-27 14:23 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-05-30 16:54 ` Eric Auger
2024-05-14 7:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: arm64: maintain per VM value for CTR_EL0 Sebastian Ott
2024-05-27 8:37 ` Shaoqin Huang
2024-05-29 10:37 ` Eric Auger [this message]
2024-05-29 15:51 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-05-29 17:35 ` Eric Auger
2024-05-30 11:24 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-05-30 12:17 ` Eric Auger
2024-05-14 7:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: arm64: add emulation for CTR_EL0 register Sebastian Ott
2024-05-29 10:37 ` Eric Auger
2024-05-30 12:56 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-05-30 17:20 ` Eric Auger
2024-05-14 7:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: arm64: show writable masks for feature registers Sebastian Ott
2024-05-29 13:49 ` Eric Auger
2024-05-14 7:22 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: arm64: rename functions for invariant sys regs Sebastian Ott
2024-05-29 13:58 ` Eric Auger
2024-05-29 15:29 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-05-29 17:17 ` Eric Auger
2024-05-14 7:22 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: selftests: arm64: Test writes to CTR_EL0 Sebastian Ott
2024-05-29 17:07 ` Eric Auger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=edbe3039-ed42-432e-8309-5a0a46cc2d5c@redhat.com \
--to=eauger@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=sebott@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox