Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] dt-bindings: display: add verisilicon,dc

Icenowy Zheng
2025-11-24T11:13:48Z

在 2025-11-24星期一的 12:09 +0100，Krzysztof Kozlowski写道：
> On 24/11/2025 12:04, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > 在 2025-11-24星期一的 12:01 +0100，Krzysztof Kozlowski写道：
> > > On 24/11/2025 11:52, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > > > Verisilicon has a series of display controllers prefixed with
> > > > DC
> > > > and
> > > > with self-identification facility like their GC series GPUs.
> > > >
> > > > Add a device tree binding for it.
> > > >
> > > > Depends on the specific DC model, it can have either one or two
> > > > display
> > > > outputs, and each display output could be set to DPI signal or
> > > > "DP"
> > > > signal (which seems to be some plain parallel bus to HDMI
> > > > controllers).
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@icenowy.me>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <zhengxingda@iscas.ac.cn>
> > >
> > > Wrong DCO chain order. You send it as icenowy.me, so this must be
> > > last
> > > SoB. This identity is the last one certifying DCO. Please kindly
> > > read
> > > submitting patches, so you know what you are certifying here.
> >
> > Well I mapped the @iscas.ac.cn mail to the @icenowy.me one in the
> > last
> > patch.
> >
> > Or maybe I should make it the first patch?
>
> .mailmap has effect on b4 and git send-email, so maybe that's the
> answer. The problem is that:
> 1. This email has sender address @icenowy.me
> 2. It's SoB is not the last one.

Well, I think a patch that is already sent shouldn't have the From
field changing when bumping revision, and a patch modified by one
identity should have the modifying one's SoB added.

So here I am using the @icenowy.me mail (which can represent the
@iscas.ac.cn mail according to the mailmap) to send the patch that is
processed by @iscas.ac.cn mail.

Sending the patch with @iscas.ac.cn mail needs some extra setup
(because of some weird security requirement).

>
> This needs to be fixed. The order of patches for me does not matter,
> I
> don't think it would fix the issue here either.
>
> Anyway, please trim your responses, so I will not have to scroll
> through
> lines of code to find that you did not respond there.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof