Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] dt-bindings: display: add verisilicon,dc

Icenowy Zheng
2025-11-24T17:43:35Z

在 2025-11-24星期一的 18:40 +0100，Krzysztof Kozlowski写道：
> On 24/11/2025 16:25, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > 在 2025-11-24星期一的 13:31 +0100，Krzysztof Kozlowski写道：
> > > On 24/11/2025 13:20, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 01:08:00PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > On 24/11/2025 13:05, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't really get what the fuss is with the dual signoff,
> > > > > > what's the
> > > > > > point having both when they represent the same person?
> > > > > > Pretty
> > > > > > sure it
> > > > > > was you (Krzysztof) and Arnd that told me not to both doing
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > double
> > > > > > signoff.
> > > > >
> > > > > I do not object having or not having dual signed off HERE.
> > > > >
> > > > > I never said that. Just like I never said "From" has to be
> > > > > changed.
> > > >
> > > > I didn't say you objected to both being there. *I* am saying
> > > > that
> > > > it is
> > >
> > > Ah, sure. Yes, if both identities work I would propose to skip
> > > second
> > > SoB. But I also stopped objecting of having two identities
> > > listed, as
> > > long as they are correct.
> >
> > Well it's unfortunate that some policy now requires me to list the
> > second identity.
>
> No policy asked you...

Local policy here, sigh...

>
> >
> > Should I resend the whole patchset with the ISCAS mail?
>
> You can, it probably would solve the issue, unless you change the
> author, but why you cannot do what I asked at the beginning - set
> correct order of SoBs, so the @icenowy.me being the last?

Well because previous revisions of the patch comes with only
@icenowy.me SoB, and I think SoB is append-only...

>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof