Re: [PATCH v7 06/24] x86/resctrl: Access per-rmid structures by index

[Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>]

Hi James,

On 10/25/2023 11:03 AM, James Morse wrote:


...
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index 0056c9962a44..fc70a2650729 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static void domain_remove_cpu(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
>  			mbm_setup_overflow_handler(d, 0);
>  		}
>  		if (is_llc_occupancy_enabled() && cpu == d->cqm_work_cpu &&
> -		    has_busy_rmid(r, d)) {
> +		    has_busy_rmid(d)) {
>  			cancel_delayed_work(&d->cqm_limbo);
>  			cqm_setup_limbo_handler(d, 0);
>  		}
> @@ -604,7 +604,8 @@ static void clear_closid_rmid(int cpu)
>  	state->default_rmid = 0;
>  	state->cur_closid = 0;
>  	state->cur_rmid = 0;

These assignments can also use the new RESERVED defines, no?

> -	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PQR_ASSOC, 0, 0);
> +	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PQR_ASSOC, RESCTRL_RESERVED_RMID,
> +	      RESCTRL_RESERVED_CLOSID);
>  }
>  


Looks like rdtgroup_setup_default() is also a candidate to replace
hardcoded "0" for closid and rmid with the new defines.


...

> @@ -670,7 +703,7 @@ void cqm_handle_limbo(struct work_struct *work)
>  
>  	__check_limbo(d, false);
>  
> -	if (has_busy_rmid(r, d))
> +	if (has_busy_rmid(d))
>  		schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, &d->cqm_limbo, delay);
>  

This change results in a new compile warning:

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c: In function ‘cqm_handle_limbo’:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c:805:30: warning: variable ‘r’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
  805 |         struct rdt_resource *r; 


Reinette