* nolibc changes for 6.8
@ 2023-12-08 17:09 Thomas Weißschuh
2023-12-09 0:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-12-11 19:52 ` Shuah Khan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Weißschuh @ 2023-12-08 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E. McKenney; +Cc: linux-kernel, WillyTarreauw, Shuah Khan
Hi Paul,
The following changes since commit b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86:
Linux 6.7-rc1 (2023-11-12 16:19:07 -0800)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git/ next
for you to fetch changes up to b99c3b15310e7c7cd5f2d843289fe115ab3f8043:
selftests/nolibc: disable coredump via setrlimit (2023-11-26 11:39:52 +0100)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Summary:
* Support for PIC mode on MIPS.
* Support for getrlimit()/setrlimit().
* Replace some custom declarations with UAPI includes.
* A new script "run-tests.sh" to run the testsuite over different architectures
and configurations.
* A few non-functional code cleanups.
* Minor improvements to nolibc-test, primarily to support the test script.
There are no urgent fixes available at this time.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Brown (1):
tools/nolibc: Use linux/wait.h rather than duplicating it
Thomas Weißschuh (21):
selftests/nolibc: don't hang on config input
selftests/nolibc: use EFI -bios for LoongArch qemu
selftests/nolibc: anchor paths in $(srcdir) if possible
selftests/nolibc: support out-of-tree builds
selftests/nolibc: add script to run testsuite
tools/nolibc: error out on unsupported architecture
tools/nolibc: move MIPS ABI validation into arch-mips.h
selftests/nolibc: use XARCH for MIPS
selftests/nolibc: explicitly specify ABI for MIPS
selftests/nolibc: extraconfig support
selftests/nolibc: add configuration for mipso32be
selftests/nolibc: fix testcase status alignment
selftests/nolibc: introduce QEMU_ARCH_USER
selftests/nolibc: run-tests.sh: enable testing via qemu-user
tools/nolibc: mips: add support for PIC
selftests/nolibc: make result alignment more robust
tools/nolibc: annotate va_list printf formats
tools/nolibc: drop duplicated testcase ioctl_tiocinq
tools/nolibc: drop custom definition of struct rusage
tools/nolibc: add support for getrlimit/setrlimit
selftests/nolibc: disable coredump via setrlimit
tools/include/nolibc/arch-mips.h | 11 +-
tools/include/nolibc/arch.h | 4 +-
tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h | 4 +-
tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 38 ++++++
tools/include/nolibc/types.h | 25 +---
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/.gitignore | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 65 ++++++++---
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 51 ++++++--
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run-tests.sh | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
9 files changed, 318 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run-tests.sh
Thanks,
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: nolibc changes for 6.8 2023-12-08 17:09 nolibc changes for 6.8 Thomas Weißschuh @ 2023-12-09 0:02 ` Paul E. McKenney 2023-12-09 8:27 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-12-11 15:26 ` Shuah Khan 2023-12-11 19:52 ` Shuah Khan 1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2023-12-09 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Weißschuh; +Cc: linux-kernel, WillyTarreauw, Shuah Khan On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 06:09:59PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > Hi Paul, > > The following changes since commit b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86: > > Linux 6.7-rc1 (2023-11-12 16:19:07 -0800) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git/ next > > for you to fetch changes up to b99c3b15310e7c7cd5f2d843289fe115ab3f8043: > > selftests/nolibc: disable coredump via setrlimit (2023-11-26 11:39:52 +0100) Thank you! I pulled this in and got the following: make run: 162 test(s): 162 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success make run-user: 162 test(s): 160 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning This looks like complete success to me, but please let me know if this is not expected behavior on an x86-64 laptop. Thanx, Paul > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Summary: > > * Support for PIC mode on MIPS. > * Support for getrlimit()/setrlimit(). > * Replace some custom declarations with UAPI includes. > * A new script "run-tests.sh" to run the testsuite over different architectures > and configurations. > * A few non-functional code cleanups. > * Minor improvements to nolibc-test, primarily to support the test script. > > There are no urgent fixes available at this time. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Mark Brown (1): > tools/nolibc: Use linux/wait.h rather than duplicating it > > Thomas Weißschuh (21): > selftests/nolibc: don't hang on config input > selftests/nolibc: use EFI -bios for LoongArch qemu > selftests/nolibc: anchor paths in $(srcdir) if possible > selftests/nolibc: support out-of-tree builds > selftests/nolibc: add script to run testsuite > tools/nolibc: error out on unsupported architecture > tools/nolibc: move MIPS ABI validation into arch-mips.h > selftests/nolibc: use XARCH for MIPS > selftests/nolibc: explicitly specify ABI for MIPS > selftests/nolibc: extraconfig support > selftests/nolibc: add configuration for mipso32be > selftests/nolibc: fix testcase status alignment > selftests/nolibc: introduce QEMU_ARCH_USER > selftests/nolibc: run-tests.sh: enable testing via qemu-user > tools/nolibc: mips: add support for PIC > selftests/nolibc: make result alignment more robust > tools/nolibc: annotate va_list printf formats > tools/nolibc: drop duplicated testcase ioctl_tiocinq > tools/nolibc: drop custom definition of struct rusage > tools/nolibc: add support for getrlimit/setrlimit > selftests/nolibc: disable coredump via setrlimit > > tools/include/nolibc/arch-mips.h | 11 +- > tools/include/nolibc/arch.h | 4 +- > tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h | 4 +- > tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 38 ++++++ > tools/include/nolibc/types.h | 25 +--- > tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/.gitignore | 1 + > tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 65 ++++++++--- > tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 51 ++++++-- > tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run-tests.sh | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 9 files changed, 318 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) > create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run-tests.sh > > > Thanks, > Thomas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: nolibc changes for 6.8 2023-12-09 0:02 ` Paul E. McKenney @ 2023-12-09 8:27 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-12-11 15:26 ` Shuah Khan 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Thomas Weißschuh @ 2023-12-09 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul E. McKenney; +Cc: linux-kernel, w, Shuah Khan On 2023-12-08 16:02:27-0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 06:09:59PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > The following changes since commit b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86: > > > > Linux 6.7-rc1 (2023-11-12 16:19:07 -0800) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git/ next > > > > for you to fetch changes up to b99c3b15310e7c7cd5f2d843289fe115ab3f8043: > > > > selftests/nolibc: disable coredump via setrlimit (2023-11-26 11:39:52 +0100) > > Thank you! > > I pulled this in and got the following: > > make run: > 162 test(s): 162 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success > > make run-user: > 162 test(s): 160 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning > > This looks like complete success to me, but please let me know if this > is not expected behavior on an x86-64 laptop. This looks good. FYI you could also use the new run-tests.sh script. Prerequisites: * qemu-user and qemu-system binaries for all supported architectures * /usr/share/edk2/loongarch64/OVMF_CODE.fd for the loongarch system tests * Pass "-p" the first time to download the toolchains. $ ./run-tests.sh -m system i386: 162 test(s): 162 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success x86_64: 162 test(s): 162 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success arm64: 162 test(s): 162 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success arm: 162 test(s): 162 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success mips32le: 162 test(s): 161 passed, 1 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning mips32be: 162 test(s): 161 passed, 1 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning ppc: 162 test(s): 162 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success ppc64: 162 test(s): 162 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success ppc64le: 162 test(s): 162 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success riscv: 162 test(s): 162 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success s390: 162 test(s): 161 passed, 1 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning loongarch: 162 test(s): 161 passed, 1 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning $ ./run-tests.sh -m user i386: 162 test(s): 160 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning x86_64: 162 test(s): 160 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning arm64: 162 test(s): 160 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning arm: 162 test(s): 160 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning mips32le: 162 test(s): 159 passed, 3 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning mips32be: 162 test(s): 159 passed, 3 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning ppc: 162 test(s): 160 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning ppc64: 162 test(s): 160 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning ppc64le: 162 test(s): 160 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning riscv: 162 test(s): 160 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning s390: 162 test(s): 159 passed, 3 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning loongarch: 162 test(s): 158 passed, 3 skipped, 1 failed => status: failure [ Note: loongarch user is currently broken due to a QEMU bug ] Thomas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: nolibc changes for 6.8 2023-12-09 0:02 ` Paul E. McKenney 2023-12-09 8:27 ` Thomas Weißschuh @ 2023-12-11 15:26 ` Shuah Khan 2023-12-11 16:20 ` Paul E. McKenney 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-12-11 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: paulmck, Thomas Weißschuh; +Cc: linux-kernel, WillyTarreauw, Shuah Khan On 12/8/23 17:02, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 06:09:59PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> The following changes since commit b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86: >> >> Linux 6.7-rc1 (2023-11-12 16:19:07 -0800) >> >> are available in the Git repository at: >> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git/ next >> >> for you to fetch changes up to b99c3b15310e7c7cd5f2d843289fe115ab3f8043: >> >> selftests/nolibc: disable coredump via setrlimit (2023-11-26 11:39:52 +0100) > > Thank you! > > I pulled this in and got the following: > > make run: > 162 test(s): 162 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success > > make run-user: > 162 test(s): 160 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning > > This looks like complete success to me, but please let me know if this > is not expected behavior on an x86-64 laptop. > Paul, This is my turn to send the pull request. Would you like me to take care of it? thanks, -- Shuah ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: nolibc changes for 6.8 2023-12-11 15:26 ` Shuah Khan @ 2023-12-11 16:20 ` Paul E. McKenney 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2023-12-11 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shuah Khan; +Cc: Thomas Weißschuh, linux-kernel, WillyTarreauw On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 08:26:00AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 12/8/23 17:02, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 06:09:59PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > The following changes since commit b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86: > > > > > > Linux 6.7-rc1 (2023-11-12 16:19:07 -0800) > > > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git/ next > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to b99c3b15310e7c7cd5f2d843289fe115ab3f8043: > > > > > > selftests/nolibc: disable coredump via setrlimit (2023-11-26 11:39:52 +0100) > > > > Thank you! > > > > I pulled this in and got the following: > > > > make run: > > 162 test(s): 162 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success > > > > make run-user: > > 162 test(s): 160 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning > > > > This looks like complete success to me, but please let me know if this > > is not expected behavior on an x86-64 laptop. > > > > Paul, > > This is my turn to send the pull request. Would you like > me to take care of it? It is indeed, apologies!!! Please do take this round. Thanx, Paul ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: nolibc changes for 6.8 2023-12-08 17:09 nolibc changes for 6.8 Thomas Weißschuh 2023-12-09 0:02 ` Paul E. McKenney @ 2023-12-11 19:52 ` Shuah Khan 2023-12-11 21:40 ` Thomas Weißschuh 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-12-11 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Weißschuh, Paul E. McKenney Cc: linux-kernel, WillyTarreauw, Shuah Khan On 12/8/23 10:09, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > Hi Paul, > > The following changes since commit b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86: > > Linux 6.7-rc1 (2023-11-12 16:19:07 -0800) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git/ next > > for you to fetch changes up to b99c3b15310e7c7cd5f2d843289fe115ab3f8043: > > selftests/nolibc: disable coredump via setrlimit (2023-11-26 11:39:52 +0100) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Summary: > > * Support for PIC mode on MIPS. > * Support for getrlimit()/setrlimit(). > * Replace some custom declarations with UAPI includes. > * A new script "run-tests.sh" to run the testsuite over different architectures > and configurations. > * A few non-functional code cleanups. > * Minor improvements to nolibc-test, primarily to support the test script. > > There are no urgent fixes available at this time. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Mark Brown (1): > tools/nolibc: Use linux/wait.h rather than duplicating it I am seeing the following problem when I run my verify_signedoff.sh verify_signedoff.sh HEAD~22...HEAD /linux/linux_kselftest/ Commit a0fa60e42bbe ("tools/nolibc: Use linux/wait.h rather than duplicating it") committer Signed-off-by missing author email: broonie@kernel.org committer email: linux@weissschuh.net Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Errors in with Signed-off-by, please fix! Is it possible to fix this? It appears commiter signed-off is missing. thanks, -- Shuah ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: nolibc changes for 6.8 2023-12-11 19:52 ` Shuah Khan @ 2023-12-11 21:40 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-12-11 23:49 ` Shuah Khan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Thomas Weißschuh @ 2023-12-11 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shuah Khan; +Cc: Paul E. McKenney, linux-kernel, WillyTarreauw Hi Shuah, On 2023-12-11 12:52:10-0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 12/8/23 10:09, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > The following changes since commit b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86: > > > > Linux 6.7-rc1 (2023-11-12 16:19:07 -0800) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git/ next > > > > for you to fetch changes up to b99c3b15310e7c7cd5f2d843289fe115ab3f8043: > > > > selftests/nolibc: disable coredump via setrlimit (2023-11-26 11:39:52 +0100) > [..] > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Mark Brown (1): > > tools/nolibc: Use linux/wait.h rather than duplicating it > > > I am seeing the following problem when I run my verify_signedoff.sh > > verify_signedoff.sh HEAD~22...HEAD /linux/linux_kselftest/ > Commit a0fa60e42bbe ("tools/nolibc: Use linux/wait.h rather than duplicating it") > committer Signed-off-by missing > author email: broonie@kernel.org > committer email: linux@weissschuh.net > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> > > Errors in with Signed-off-by, please fix! > > Is it possible to fix this? It appears commiter signed-off is missing. Thanks for spotting this! The fixed commits are published on the same "next" branch as before with final commit d543d9ddf593b1f4cb1d57d9ac0ad279fe18adaf. Thomas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: nolibc changes for 6.8 2023-12-11 21:40 ` Thomas Weißschuh @ 2023-12-11 23:49 ` Shuah Khan 2023-12-12 15:31 ` Shuah Khan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-12-11 23:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Weißschuh Cc: Paul E. McKenney, linux-kernel, WillyTarreauw, Shuah Khan Hi Thomas, On 12/11/23 14:40, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > Hi Shuah, > > > Thanks for spotting this! > > The fixed commits are published on the same "next" branch as before with > final commit d543d9ddf593b1f4cb1d57d9ac0ad279fe18adaf. > Thank you. Pulled and pushed to linux-kselftest nolibc branch. thanks, -- Shuah ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: nolibc changes for 6.8 2023-12-11 23:49 ` Shuah Khan @ 2023-12-12 15:31 ` Shuah Khan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-12-12 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Weißschuh Cc: Paul E. McKenney, linux-kernel, WillyTarreauw, Shuah Khan On 12/11/23 16:49, Shuah Khan wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On 12/11/23 14:40, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: >> Hi Shuah, >> > >> >> Thanks for spotting this! >> >> The fixed commits are published on the same "next" branch as before with >> final commit d543d9ddf593b1f4cb1d57d9ac0ad279fe18adaf. >> > > Thank you. > > Pulled and pushed to linux-kselftest nolibc branch. > Forgot to mention that I ran "make run" and "make run-user" and saw the same results Paul saw. All good. thanks, -- Shuah ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-12 15:31 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-12-08 17:09 nolibc changes for 6.8 Thomas Weißschuh 2023-12-09 0:02 ` Paul E. McKenney 2023-12-09 8:27 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-12-11 15:26 ` Shuah Khan 2023-12-11 16:20 ` Paul E. McKenney 2023-12-11 19:52 ` Shuah Khan 2023-12-11 21:40 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2023-12-11 23:49 ` Shuah Khan 2023-12-12 15:31 ` Shuah Khan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox