From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759057AbYE3APg (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 20:15:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754472AbYE3APZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 20:15:25 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.30]:29645 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754270AbYE3APY (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 20:15:24 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ItFM5gdNoAzWi1ohQrb4vD04w4Q5bh7uyMQKye8JyXwwRgcgPDScuoX5F8GCIhufOy1lYZl5Bx1Ci7bZOmY9UgmnHLK/0gtAHc0Dx77VF/iWGQOH+jXbMRwPnqWuSIbUePjmA8dBHK7vuwsywX2bVjKsAVzAyGdMz2/+/Q1rxtI= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 17:15:18 -0700 From: Leonid To: "David Brownell" Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] USB fixes for 2.6.26-rc4 Cc: "Greg KH" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Andrew Morton" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200805291448.40075.david-b@pacbell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080529212110.GA2870@suse.de> <200805291448.40075.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Dave, Sure, I somewhat understand your concerns about the timeout change, but we responded to an email form you over a week ago and never received a reply regarding our viewpoint. It was sent to your personal email address as well as to the public linux-usb list. Please refer to the email titled "[PATCH 5/5] EHCI: fix performance regression" dated Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:02 PM. In that email, we state that it doesn't make sense to reduce the timeout to 3ms and we still don't have a full understanding of why increasing it to 10 ms is such a bad idea. While we had initially been discussing this bug with you over private emails, once we lost touch with you, we resolved it in close collaboration with Alan. We have spent many tens of hours working on this bug with Alan. We'd appreciate the ability to stay in the loop with any technical issues pertaining to and arising from the patch, and to have our concerns properly responded to. -Leonid On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:48 PM, David Brownell wrote: > On Thursday 29 May 2008, Greg KH wrote: >> USB: EHCI: fix performance regression > > That's not a regresssion at all! Plus, this patch shouldn't > have included the timeout change. The timeout change is why > I didn't ACK this patch... > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >