linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] khugepaged: Optimize __collapse_huge_page_copy_succeeded() by PTE batching
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 09:23:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0037dc3-a8a9-4dda-9ba1-1032eeb34895@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f350b114-c932-4516-98f6-caf3599208f8@lucifer.local>


On 25/06/25 5:44 pm, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> You forgot the v2 here :) this breaks b4 shazam...
>
> I managed to do this on the cover letter (but not patches) of a series
> before. So you're in good company... ;)
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 11:28:04AM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
>> Use PTE batching to optimize __collapse_huge_page_copy_succeeded().
>>
>> On arm64, suppose khugepaged is scanning a pte-mapped 2MB THP for collapse.
>> Then, calling ptep_clear() for every pte will cause a TLB flush for every
>> contpte block. Instead, clear_full_ptes() does a
>> contpte_try_unfold_partial() which will flush the TLB only for the (if any)
>> starting and ending contpte block, if they partially overlap with the range
>> khugepaged is looking at.
>>
>> For all arches, there should be a benefit due to batching atomic operations
>> on mapcounts due to folio_remove_rmap_ptes().
>>
>> No issues were observed with mm-selftests.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> Overall looking way way better! Just some nits below.
>
>> ---
>>   mm/khugepaged.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
>>   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> index d45d08b521f6..3944b112d452 100644
>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> @@ -700,12 +700,15 @@ static void __collapse_huge_page_copy_succeeded(pte_t *pte,
>>   						spinlock_t *ptl,
>>   						struct list_head *compound_pagelist)
>>   {
>> +	unsigned long end = address + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE;
>>   	struct folio *src, *tmp;
>> -	pte_t *_pte;
>>   	pte_t pteval;
>> +	pte_t *_pte;
>> +	int nr_ptes;
>>
>> -	for (_pte = pte; _pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR;
>> -	     _pte++, address += PAGE_SIZE) {
>> +	for (_pte = pte; _pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR; _pte += nr_ptes,
>> +	     address += nr_ptes * PAGE_SIZE) {
> Thanks this is much better.
>
>> +		nr_ptes = 1;
>>   		pteval = ptep_get(_pte);
>>   		if (pte_none(pteval) || is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(pteval))) {
>>   			add_mm_counter(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES, 1);
>> @@ -719,21 +722,33 @@ static void __collapse_huge_page_copy_succeeded(pte_t *pte,
>>   				ksm_might_unmap_zero_page(vma->vm_mm, pteval);
>>   			}
>>   		} else {
>> +			const fpb_t flags = FPB_IGNORE_DIRTY | FPB_IGNORE_SOFT_DIRTY;
>> +			int max_nr_ptes;
>> +
>>   			struct page *src_page = pte_page(pteval);
>>
>>   			src = page_folio(src_page);
>>   			if (!folio_test_large(src))
>>   				release_pte_folio(src);
>> +
>> +			max_nr_ptes = (end - address) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +			if (folio_test_large(src))
>> +				nr_ptes = folio_pte_batch(src, address, _pte,
>> +							  pteval, max_nr_ptes,
>> +							  flags, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> Nit, but we only use max_nr_ptes here so could declare and set here, e.g.:
>
> 			if (folio_test_large(src)) {
> 				int max_nr_ptes = (end - address) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> 				nr_ptes = folio_pte_batch(src, address, _pte,
> 							  pteval, max_nr_ptes,
> 							  flags, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> 			}
>
> BTW I think David raised it, but is there a way to wrap folio_pte_batch() to not
> have to NULL, NULL, NULL here? :)
>
>
> oh and if we do this, we can also combine this line with above so:
>
> 			if (folio_test_large(src)) {
> 				int max_nr_ptes = (end - address) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> 				nr_ptes = folio_pte_batch(src, address, _pte,
> 							  pteval, max_nr_ptes,
> 							  flags, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> 			} else {
>    				release_pte_folio(src);
> 			}
>
> Which is neater.

Okay.

>
>> +
>>   			/*
>>   			 * ptl mostly unnecessary, but preempt has to
>>   			 * be disabled to update the per-cpu stats
>>   			 * inside folio_remove_rmap_pte().
>>   			 */
>>   			spin_lock(ptl);
>> -			ptep_clear(vma->vm_mm, address, _pte);
>> -			folio_remove_rmap_pte(src, src_page, vma);
>> +			clear_full_ptes(vma->vm_mm, address, _pte, nr_ptes,
>> +					/* full = */ false);
>> +			folio_remove_rmap_ptes(src, src_page, nr_ptes, vma);
>>   			spin_unlock(ptl);
>> -			free_folio_and_swap_cache(src);
>> +			free_swap_cache(src);
>> +			folio_put_refs(src, nr_ptes);
>>   		}
>>   	}
>>
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-26  3:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-25  5:58 [PATCH v2 0/3] Optimizations for khugepaged Dev Jain
2025-06-25  5:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] khugepaged: Optimize __collapse_huge_page_copy_succeeded() by PTE batching Dev Jain
2025-06-25 11:14   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-25 11:19     ` Dev Jain
2025-06-25 12:14   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-25 12:22     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-26  3:53     ` Dev Jain [this message]
2025-06-25  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] khugepaged: Optimize collapse_pte_mapped_thp() for large folios " Dev Jain
2025-06-25 13:11   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-26  3:48     ` Dev Jain
2025-06-26  4:47       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-26  4:54         ` Dev Jain
2025-07-15  6:34         ` Dev Jain
2025-07-15  9:43           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-15  9:56             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-15 10:02               ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-15 10:40                 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-15 11:13                   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-25  5:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] khugepaged: Reduce race probability between migration and khugepaged Dev Jain
2025-06-25 13:28   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-26  3:52     ` Dev Jain
2025-06-26  4:57       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-26  4:59         ` Dev Jain
2025-06-26  5:02           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-26  5:04             ` Dev Jain
2025-06-26  5:06             ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-26  5:27               ` Dev Jain
2025-06-25 10:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Optimizations for khugepaged Lorenzo Stoakes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f0037dc3-a8a9-4dda-9ba1-1032eeb34895@arm.com \
    --to=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).