From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752966AbXDRChy (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:37:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965055AbXDRChx (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:37:53 -0400 Received: from taverner.CS.Berkeley.EDU ([128.32.168.222]:39726 "EHLO taverner.cs.berkeley.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752966AbXDRChx (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:37:53 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: not-for-mail From: daw@cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner) Newsgroups: isaac.lists.linux-kernel Subject: Re: AppArmor FAQ Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Message-ID: References: <20070417181016.GA10903@one.firstfloor.org> Reply-To: daw-usenet@taverner.cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner) NNTP-Posting-Host: taverner.cs.berkeley.edu X-Trace: taverner.cs.berkeley.edu 1176863470 14186 128.32.168.222 (18 Apr 2007 02:31:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@taverner.cs.berkeley.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:31:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) Originator: daw@taverner.cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org James Morris wrote: >This is not what the discussion is about. It's about addressing the many >points in the FAQ posted here which are likely to cause misunderstandings, >and then subsequent responses of a similar nature. Thank you. Then I misunderstood, and I owe you an apology. Thank you for your patience and for correcting my mistaken impression. For what it's worth, I agreed with most or all of the comments you made in your original response to the FAQ posted here. I thought they were constructive. What got me to ranting was an email from Karl MacMillan that seemed focused more on debating the merits of AppArmor rather than on improving the FAQ.