From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@linux.intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
"Subhransu S . Prusty" <subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: mrfld: fix incorrect check on p->sink
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 08:23:30 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f084c578-2fd5-e090-7d90-1ddffa1e22be@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191119113640.166940-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On 11/19/19 5:36 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The check on p->sink looks bogus, I believe it should be p->source
> since the following code blocks are related to p->source. Fix
> this by replacing p->sink with p->source.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Copy-paste error")
> Fixes: 24c8d14192cc ("ASoC: Intel: mrfld: add DSP core controls")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>
> [ Note: this has not been tested ]
>
wow, nice catch. this dates from October 2014 and was merged in Linux 3.19.
I did look at the entire function and indeed it does not seem logical at
all and rather an unintentional bad copy-paste, probably undetected
since changing the gains on capture is less straightforward to test.
if (stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) {
dev_dbg(dai->dev, "Stream name=%s\n",
dai->playback_widget->name);
w = dai->playback_widget;
snd_soc_dapm_widget_for_each_sink_path(w, p) {
if (p->connected && !p->connected(w, p->sink))
continue;
[snip]
}
} else {
dev_dbg(dai->dev, "Stream name=%s\n",
dai->capture_widget->name);
w = dai->capture_widget;
snd_soc_dapm_widget_for_each_source_path(w, p) {
if (p->connected && !p->connected(w, p->sink))
<< here it doesn't look right to use sink here.
continue;
This macro snd_soc_dapm_widget_for_each_source_path() is also used in
the skylake/skl-topology.c but without any source/sink inversion.
I don't think anyone on the Intel side will have time to investigate
further, and unless someone from the initial contributors states this
was intentional (Vinod/Sanyog?), we should merge this.
let's see if there's any feedback and if not I'll ack this.
> ---
> sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c
> index baef461a99f1..f883c9340eee 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c
> @@ -1333,7 +1333,7 @@ int sst_send_pipe_gains(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int stream, int mute)
> dai->capture_widget->name);
> w = dai->capture_widget;
> snd_soc_dapm_widget_for_each_source_path(w, p) {
> - if (p->connected && !p->connected(w, p->sink))
> + if (p->connected && !p->connected(w, p->source))
> continue;
>
> if (p->connect && p->source->power &&
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-19 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-19 11:36 [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: mrfld: fix incorrect check on p->sink Colin King
2019-11-19 14:23 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2020-02-25 13:24 ` Applied "ASoC: Intel: mrfld: fix incorrect check on p->sink" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f084c578-2fd5-e090-7d90-1ddffa1e22be@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
--cc=subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yang.jie@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox