Re: AppArmor FAQ

James Morris
2007-04-17T20:50:11Z

On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Casey Schaufler wrote:

> those names it cares about. SELinux in the absence of a correct and
> complete policy could be considered dangerous.

It should be noted that SELinux is only recommended as an addition to DAC,
not a replacement, so that it can only further restrict existing access
control.

- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>