From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ming Wang <wangming01@loongson.cn>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
Dmitrii Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Ali Saidi <alisaidi@amazon.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
Kang Minchul <tegongkang@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf test amd: Fix build failure with amd-ibs-via-core-pmu.c -- Was: Re: [PATCH v5 27/34] perf pmu: Separate pmu and pmus
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 10:59:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0d9ff32-c4e6-674e-0719-833334f39e5d@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230527072210.2900565-28-irogers@google.com>
On 27-May-23 12:52 PM, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Separate and hide the pmus list in pmus.[ch]. Move pmus functionality
> out of pmu.[ch] into pmus.[ch] renaming pmus functions which were
> prefixed perf_pmu__ to perf_pmus__.
I'm seeing perf tool build failures on linux-next because a patch[1] went in
via Peter's tree needed some changes done by this patch.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/168372562075.404.10852387134590654382.tip-bot2@tip-bot2
Below patch fixes the issue.
From c041b94df00baea024b64d4b19e37ee827484e74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 15:23:22 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] perf test amd: Fix build failure with amd-ibs-via-core-pmu.c
Since amd-ibs-via-core-pmu.c was applied via Peter's tree, some of
the changes came via Arnaldo's tree did not reflected in this file,
which is causing build failures.
arch/x86/tests/amd-ibs-via-core-pmu.c:47:25: error: ‘pmus’ undeclared
(first use in this function)
47 | if (list_empty(&pmus))
| ^~~~
arch/x86/tests/amd-ibs-via-core-pmu.c:48:17: error: implicit declaration
of function ‘perf_pmu__scan’; did you mean
perf_pmus__scan’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
48 | perf_pmu__scan(NULL);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| perf_pmus__scan
arch/x86/tests/amd-ibs-via-core-pmu.c:50:19: error: implicit declaration
of function ‘perf_pmu__find’; did you mean
perf_pmus__find’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
50 | ibs_pmu = perf_pmu__find("ibs_op");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| perf_pmus__find
Fix those.
Fixes: 1eaf496ed386 ("perf pmu: Separate pmu and pmus")
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
---
tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/amd-ibs-via-core-pmu.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/amd-ibs-via-core-pmu.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/amd-ibs-via-core-pmu.c
index 2902798ca5c1..1e08b2455725 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/amd-ibs-via-core-pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/amd-ibs-via-core-pmu.c
@@ -44,10 +44,10 @@ int test__amd_ibs_via_core_pmu(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
int ret = TEST_OK;
int fd, i;
- if (list_empty(&pmus))
- perf_pmu__scan(NULL);
+ /* No way to know whether pmus list is already populated or not. */
+ perf_pmus__scan(NULL);
- ibs_pmu = perf_pmu__find("ibs_op");
+ ibs_pmu = perf_pmus__find("ibs_op");
if (!ibs_pmu)
return TEST_SKIP;
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-02 5:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-27 7:21 [PATCH v5 00/34] PMU refactoring and improvements Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 01/34] perf cpumap: Add internal nr and cpu accessors Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 02/34] perf cpumap: Add equal function Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 03/34] libperf cpumap: Add "any CPU"/dummy test function Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 04/34] perf pmu: Detect ARM and hybrid PMUs with sysfs Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 05/34] perf pmu: Add is_core to pmu Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 06/34] perf evsel: Add is_pmu_core inorder to interpret own_cpus Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 07/34] perf pmu: Add CPU map for "cpu" PMUs Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 08/34] perf evlist: Propagate user CPU maps intersecting core PMU maps Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 09/34] perf evlist: Allow has_user_cpus to be set on hybrid Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 10/34] perf target: Remove unused hybrid value Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 11/34] perf tools: Warn if no user requested CPUs match PMU's CPUs Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 12/34] perf evlist: Remove evlist__warn_hybrid_group Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 13/34] perf evlist: Remove __evlist__add_default Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 14/34] perf evlist: Reduce scope of evlist__has_hybrid Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 15/34] perf pmu: Remove perf_pmu__hybrid_mounted Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 16/34] perf pmu: Rewrite perf_pmu__has_hybrid to avoid list Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 17/34] perf x86: Iterate hybrid PMUs as core PMUs Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 18/34] perf topology: Avoid hybrid list for hybrid topology Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 19/34] perf evsel: Compute is_hybrid from PMU being core Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 20/34] perf header: Avoid hybrid PMU list in write_pmu_caps Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 21/34] perf metrics: Remove perf_pmu__is_hybrid use Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 22/34] perf stat: Avoid hybrid PMU list Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 23/34] perf mem: " Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:22 ` [PATCH v5 24/34] perf pmu: Remove perf_pmu__hybrid_pmus list Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:22 ` [PATCH v5 25/34] perf pmus: Prefer perf_pmu__scan over perf_pmus__for_each_pmu Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:22 ` [PATCH v5 26/34] perf x86 mem: minor refactor to is_mem_loads_aux_event Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:22 ` [PATCH v5 27/34] perf pmu: Separate pmu and pmus Ian Rogers
2023-06-02 5:29 ` Ravi Bangoria [this message]
2023-06-02 6:42 ` [PATCH] perf test amd: Fix build failure with amd-ibs-via-core-pmu.c -- Was: " Ian Rogers
2023-06-03 4:46 ` [PATCH v2] perf test amd: Fix build failure with amd-ibs-via-core-pmu.c Ravi Bangoria
2023-06-05 14:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-06-06 3:12 ` Ravi Bangoria
2023-06-06 4:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-07 0:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-27 7:22 ` [PATCH v5 28/34] perf pmus: Split pmus list into core and other Ian Rogers
2023-06-09 3:59 ` Ravi Bangoria
2023-06-09 4:40 ` Ian Rogers
2023-06-09 5:30 ` Ravi Bangoria
2023-06-09 5:35 ` Ian Rogers
2023-06-09 5:55 ` Ravi Bangoria
2023-06-09 6:00 ` Ian Rogers
2023-06-09 6:02 ` Ravi Bangoria
2023-06-09 7:58 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-11 3:55 ` Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:22 ` [PATCH v5 29/34] perf pmus: Allow just core PMU scanning Ian Rogers
2023-06-09 6:12 ` Ravi Bangoria
2023-05-27 7:22 ` [PATCH v5 30/34] perf pmus: Avoid repeated sysfs scanning Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:22 ` [PATCH v5 31/34] perf pmus: Ensure all PMUs are read for find_by_type Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:22 ` [PATCH v5 32/34] perf pmus: Add function to return count of core PMUs Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:22 ` [PATCH v5 33/34] perf pmus: Remove perf_pmus__has_hybrid Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 7:22 ` [PATCH v5 34/34] perf pmu: Remove is_pmu_hybrid Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f0d9ff32-c4e6-674e-0719-833334f39e5d@amd.com \
--to=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=9erthalion6@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alisaidi@amazon.com \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tegongkang@gmail.com \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wangming01@loongson.cn \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox