public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Kyung Min Park <kyung.min.park@intel.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>,
	Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@hpe.com>,
	Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>,
	Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iommu/vt-d: Make DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED a config setting
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:29:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0e4adc8-5d67-b76a-d0f1-2df83bd69a82@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALzcdduhpOebY18hiOpMcXLcH83bY_u4fZT09pBcoz2ObqXnGg@mail.gmail.com>

On 2022/6/22 23:05, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 7:52 AM Baolu Lu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>  wrote:
>> On 2022/6/16 02:36, Steve Wahl wrote:
>>> To support up to 64 sockets with 10 DMAR units each (640), make the
>>> value of DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED adjustable by a config variable,
>>> CONFIG_DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED, and make it's default 1024 when MAXSMP is
>>> set.
>>>
>>> If the available hardware exceeds DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED (previously set
>>> to MAX_IO_APICS, or 128), it causes these messages: "DMAR: Failed to
>>> allocate seq_id", "DMAR: Parse DMAR table failure.", and "x2apic: IRQ
>>> remapping doesn't support X2APIC mode x2apic disabled"; and the system
>>> fails to boot properly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Steve Wahl<steve.wahl@hpe.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian<kevin.tian@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Note that we could not find a reason for connecting
>>> DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED to MAX_IO_APICS as was done previously.  Perhaps
>>> it seemed like the two would continue to match on earlier processors.
>>> There doesn't appear to be kernel code that assumes that the value of
>>> one is related to the other.
>>>
>>> v2: Make this value a config option, rather than a fixed constant.  The default
>>> values should match previous configuration except in the MAXSMP case.  Keeping the
>>> value at a power of two was requested by Kevin Tian.
>>>
>>> v3: Make the config option dependent upon DMAR_TABLE, as it is not used without this.
>>>
>>>    drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
>>>    include/linux/dmar.h        | 6 +-----
>>>    2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig
>>> index 39a06d245f12..07aaebcb581d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig
>>> @@ -9,6 +9,13 @@ config DMAR_PERF
>>>    config DMAR_DEBUG
>>>        bool
>>>
>>> +config DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED
>>> +     int "Number of DMA Remapping Units supported"
>>> +     depends on DMAR_TABLE
>>> +     default 1024 if MAXSMP
>>> +     default 128  if X86_64
>>> +     default 64
>> With this patch applied, the IOMMU configuration looks like:
>>
>> [*]   AMD IOMMU support
>> <M>     AMD IOMMU Version 2 driver
>> [*]     Enable AMD IOMMU internals in DebugFS
>> (1024) Number of DMA Remapping Units supported   <<<< NEW
>> [*]   Support for Intel IOMMU using DMA Remapping Devices
>> [*]     Export Intel IOMMU internals in Debugfs
>> [*]     Support for Shared Virtual Memory with Intel IOMMU
>> [*]     Enable Intel DMA Remapping Devices by default
>> [*]     Enable Intel IOMMU scalable mode by default
>> [*]   Support for Interrupt Remapping
>> [*]   OMAP IOMMU Support
>> [*]     Export OMAP IOMMU internals in DebugFS
>> [*]   Rockchip IOMMU Support
>>
>> The NEW item looks confusing. It looks to be a generic configurable
>> value though it's actually Intel DMAR specific. Any thoughts?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> baolu
>>
> Would moving it under INTEL_IOMMU at least have it show up below
> "Support for Intel IOMMU using DMA Remapping Devices"? I'm not sure it
> can be better than that, because IRQ_REMAP selects DMAR_TABLE, so we
> can't stick it in the if INTEL_IOMMU section.

It's more reasonable to move it under INTEL_IOMMU, but the trouble is
that this also stands even if INTEL_IOMMU is not configured.

The real problem here is that the iommu sequence ID overflows if
DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED is not big enough. This is purely a software
implementation issue, I am not sure whether user opt-in when building a
kernel package could help a lot here.

If we can't find a better way, can we just step back?

Best regards,
baolu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-23  2:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-05 19:46 [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Increase DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED Steve Wahl
2022-05-06  5:57 ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-06  6:49   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-05-06  7:10     ` Rodel, Jorg
2022-05-06  7:47       ` Tian, Kevin
2022-05-06  7:16     ` David Woodhouse
2022-05-06  8:12       ` Tian, Kevin
2022-05-06 15:26         ` Steve Wahl
2022-05-10  1:16           ` Tian, Kevin
2022-05-10 19:06             ` Steve Wahl
2022-05-11  3:36               ` Tian, Kevin
2022-05-12 15:13 ` [PATCH v2] iommu/vt-d: Make DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED a config setting Steve Wahl
2022-05-12 23:12   ` Steve Wahl
2022-05-13  2:09     ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-18 19:58       ` Steve Wahl
2022-05-23  6:43         ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-13 20:38   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2022-06-14  1:33     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-13 20:57   ` Jerry Snitselaar
2022-06-14  1:36     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-14  1:44       ` Jerry Snitselaar
2022-06-14  1:51         ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-14  1:54           ` Jerry Snitselaar
2022-06-14  2:21             ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-14 16:45               ` Steve Wahl
2022-06-14 19:01                 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2022-06-14 21:12                   ` Steve Wahl
2022-06-15  1:38                     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-15 15:02                       ` Steve Wahl
2022-06-15 18:36                       ` [PATCH v3] " Steve Wahl
2022-06-15 18:39                         ` Jerry Snitselaar
2022-06-22 14:52                         ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-22 15:05                           ` Jerry Snitselaar
2022-06-22 15:11                             ` Steve Wahl
2022-06-23  2:29                             ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2022-06-23  2:51                               ` Jerry Snitselaar
2022-06-23  3:38                                 ` Baolu Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f0e4adc8-5d67-b76a-d0f1-2df83bd69a82@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kyung.min.park@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.travis@hpe.com \
    --cc=russ.anderson@hpe.com \
    --cc=sivanich@hpe.com \
    --cc=steve.wahl@hpe.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox