public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: WARNING: can't access registers at asm_common_interrupt
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:56:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f105a63d-6b51-3afb-83e0-e899ea40813e@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXcTKB_j9MQC1mcZobKGt_cZ5ivDPjU3zwRBmj7DAUCsA@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1727 bytes --]

On 13.11.20 18:34, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 12:25 PM Andrew Cooper
> <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/11/2020 20:15, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 09:07:30PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 01:59:00PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 08:42:06PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>>>>> Would objtool have an easier time coping if this were implemented in
>>>>>>> terms of a static call?
>>>>>> I doubt it, the big problem is that there is no visibility into the
>>>>>> actual alternative text. Runtime patching fragments into static call
>>>>>> would have the exact same problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Something that _might_ maybe work is trying to morph the immediate
>>>>>> fragments into an alternative. That is, instead of this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static inline notrace unsigned long arch_local_save_flags(void)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>     return PVOP_CALLEE0(unsigned long, irq.save_fl);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Write it something like:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static inline notrace unsigned long arch_local_save_flags(void)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>     PVOP_CALL_ARGS;
>>>>>>     PVOP_TEST_NULL(irq.save_fl);
>>>>>>     asm_inline volatile(ALTERNATIVE(paravirt_alt(PARAVIRT_CALL),
>>>>>>                                     "PUSHF; POP _ASM_AX",
>>>>>>                                     X86_FEATURE_NATIVE)

I am wondering whether we really want a new feature (basically "not
XENPV). We could use ~X86_FEATURE_XENPV and teach apply_alternatives()
to understand negated features (yes, this limits the number of features
to 32767, but I don't think this is a real problem for quite some time).

Thoughts?


Juergen

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3135 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-16 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-06  6:04 WARNING: can't access registers at asm_common_interrupt Shinichiro Kawasaki
2020-11-06 18:06 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-11-09  9:10   ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2020-11-10  3:19     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-11-10  9:19       ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2020-11-11 17:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-11-11 17:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-11 18:13     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-11-11 18:46       ` Andrew Cooper
2020-11-11 19:42         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-11 19:59           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-11-11 20:07             ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-11 20:15               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-11-11 20:25                 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-11-11 20:39                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-13 17:34                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-14  9:16                     ` Jürgen Groß
2020-11-14 18:10                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-15  6:33                         ` Jürgen Groß
2020-11-15 16:05                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-15 16:13                             ` Jürgen Groß
2020-11-16 11:56                     ` Jürgen Groß [this message]
2020-11-16 13:04                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-18  6:47                         ` Jürgen Groß
2020-11-18  8:22                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-19 11:51                             ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2020-11-19 12:01                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-19 12:28                                 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-11-19 12:48                                 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2020-11-11 20:35                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-11 20:42       ` Peter Zijlstra
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-09-06 20:46 syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f105a63d-6b51-3afb-83e0-e899ea40813e@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox