From: "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@baidu.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "jslaby@suse.com" <jslaby@suse.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"gkohli@codeaurora.org" <gkohli@codeaurora.org>
Subject: 答复: [PATCH][v4] tty: fix race between flush_to_ldisc and tty_open
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 12:48:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f13cb07ed77d428b8b43459ff71adcae@baidu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190130101914.GA30587@kroah.com>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] 代表 Greg KH
> 发送时间: 2019年1月30日 18:19
> 收件人: Li,Rongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
> 抄送: jslaby@suse.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; gkohli@codeaurora.org
> 主题: Re: [PATCH][v4] tty: fix race between flush_to_ldisc and tty_open
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 05:27:17PM +0800, Li RongQing wrote:
> > There still is a race window after the commit b027e2298bd588
> > ("tty: fix data race between tty_init_dev and flush of buf"), and we
> > encountered this crash issue if receive_buf call comes before tty
> > initialization completes in n_tty_open and
> > tty->driver_data may be NULL.
> >
> > CPU0 CPU1
> > ---- ----
> > n_tty_open
> > tty_init_dev
> > tty_ldisc_unlock
> > schedule flush_to_ldisc
> > receive_buf
> > tty_port_default_receive_buf
> > tty_ldisc_receive_buf
> > n_tty_receive_buf_common
> > __receive_buf
> > uart_flush_chars
> > uart_start
> > /*tty->driver_data is NULL*/
> > tty->ops->open
> > /*init tty->driver_data*/
> >
> > it can be fixed by extending ldisc semaphore lock in tty_init_dev to
> > driver_data initialized completely after tty->ops->open(), but this
> > will lead to put lock on one function and unlock in some other
> > function, and hard to maintain, so fix this race only by checking
> > tty->driver_data when receiving, and return if tty->driver_data
> > is NULL
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wang Li <wangli39@baidu.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Yu <zhangyu31@baidu.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
> > ---
> > V4: add version information
> > V3: not used ldisc semaphore lock, only checking tty->driver_data with
> > NULL
> > V2: fix building error by EXPORT_SYMBOL tty_ldisc_unlock
> > V1: extend ldisc lock to protect that tty->driver_data is inited
> >
> > drivers/tty/tty_port.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_port.c b/drivers/tty/tty_port.c index
> > 044c3cbdcfa4..86d0bec38322 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/tty_port.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_port.c
> > @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ static int tty_port_default_receive_buf(struct tty_port
> *port,
> > if (!tty)
> > return 0;
> >
> > + if (!tty->driver_data)
> > + return 0;
> > +
>
> How is this working? What is setting driver_data to NULL to "stop" this race?
>
if tty->driver_data is NULL and return, tty_port_default_receive_buf will not step to
uart_start which access tty->driver_data and trigger panic before tty_open, so it can
fix the system panic
> There's no requirement that a tty driver set this field to NULL when it is "done"
> with the tty device, so I think you are just getting lucky in that your specific
> driver happens to be doing this.
>
when tty_open is running, tty is allocated by kzalloc in tty_init_dev which called
by tty_open_by_driver, tty is inited to 0
> What driver are you testing this against?
>
8250
Thanks
-RongQing
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-30 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-18 9:27 [PATCH][v4] tty: fix race between flush_to_ldisc and tty_open Li RongQing
2019-01-18 12:50 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2019-01-30 9:29 ` 答复: " Li,Rongqing
2019-01-30 10:19 ` Greg KH
2019-01-30 12:48 ` Li,Rongqing [this message]
2019-01-30 13:16 ` 答复: " Greg KH
2019-01-31 2:15 ` 答复: " Li,Rongqing
2019-01-31 6:52 ` Greg KH
2019-01-31 7:40 ` 答复: " Li,Rongqing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f13cb07ed77d428b8b43459ff71adcae@baidu.com \
--to=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=gkohli@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox