From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261563AbVFMRVO (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:21:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261573AbVFMRVN (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:21:13 -0400 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.200]:24620 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261563AbVFMRU5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:20:57 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ow7Z19jpYfVIC7VRVv/vwi8ojrgoNWrQJ6eA9qHFz5SRbgX6n0fchmCCFw2hzf2P5rAUGUbjgB6dRfA3lCxqC5RZyL4L1ewxiOjSeZrV0eQHxnvKzWNO3kejhLTrvyRSuB5eMlDqK8o3xoDIpwUmglv0Foz4935jtQMv8F253g4= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 21:20:53 +0400 From: Alexey Zaytsev Reply-To: Alexey Zaytsev To: Alan Cox Subject: Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS. Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1118669746.13260.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <1118669746.13260.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13/06/05, Alan Cox wrote: > On Llu, 2005-06-13 at 11:38, Alexey Zaytsev wrote: > > Instead of adding NLS support to filesystems who don't have it yet, I > > think there should be a global NLS layer, to convert file names from > > any to any encoding, independent of file system and transparently to > > the user. > > Thats essentially what we have. The core OS is UTF-8, the fat and one or > two other legacy file systems support mapping old and/or inferior > encodings into utf-8 (and some other stuff). Yes, that's how it works, but if I want ext or reiser or whatever to have NLS, I'll have to make them support it (btw, if I do so, wont it be rejected?). I want to move the NLS one level upper so the filesystem imlementations won't have to worry about it any more. I don't have much kernel experience, and none in the fs area, so I can't explain it any better, but hope you get the idea. > Alan Thank you answering.